From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754018Ab2CEPux (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:50:53 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:40890 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752806Ab2CEPuv (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:50:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:50:11 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Stephane Eranian Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, dsahern@gmail.com, ravitillo@lbl.gov, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, asharma@fb.com, robert.richter@amd.com, ming.m.lin@intel.com, vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu, andi@firstfloor.org, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: auto-detect branch stack sampling mode Message-ID: <20120305155011.GA32413@elte.hu> References: <20120224094048.GA7952@quad> <20120305154753.GA14604@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120305154753.GA14604@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ingo Molnar wrote: > Really, we should do better than this. Only people who *want* > to specify finer LBR filters should be forced to specify them. Another detail is that perf record outputs this message: [ perf record: Captured and wrote 1.699 MB perf.data (~74220 samples) ] The '~74220 samples' should probably say '~74220 branch samples'. (And yes, I realize that it's not just branch samples but that's not a big issue.) Thanks, Ingo