public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@gazzang.com>,
	ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linus GIT (3.3.0-rc6+) -- INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:46:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120305214621.GC29910@boyd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120305213557.GO23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1399 bytes --]

On 2012-03-05 21:35:58, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:23:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > mmap_sem nests inside i_mutex.
> > 
> > On the path
> > 
> > 	munmap
> > 	->ecryptfs_vma_close
> > 	  ->filemap_write_and_wait
> > 	    ->generic_file_aio_write
> > 
> > we're taking i_mutex inside mmap_sem.  So the problem is triggered by
> > ecryptfs_vma_close() calling filemap_write_and_wait() inside munmap()'s
> > mmap_sem.
> > 
> > Question is: what did we recently change to cause this to happen?
> 
> AFAICS, it's commit 32001d6fe9ac6b0423e674a3093aa56740849f3b
> Author: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
> Date:   Mon Nov 21 17:31:29 2011 -0600
> 
>     eCryptfs: Flush file in vma close

Yes, it is definitely this commit. This is mainly what brought about my
patch to fix the incorrect logic around lockdep_set_class() in
lockdep_annotate_inode_mutex_key(). With that patch, I no longer saw
these lockdep warnings, so I wrote it off. Al has since made it clear
that this locking order is wrong.

This should fix itself when I revert
57db4e8d73ef2b5e94a3f412108dff2576670a8a. We'll no longer need this
flush in vma_close(), so 32001d6fe9ac6b0423e674a3093aa56740849f3b will
be reverted, too. I was planning on waiting until 3.4 to do all of that
since it will be a somewhat big change (even though it is mainly
reverting of patches).

Tyler

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-05 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-05 21:08 Linus GIT (3.3.0-rc6+) -- INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Miles Lane
2012-03-05 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-05 21:35   ` Al Viro
2012-03-05 21:46     ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
2012-03-05 21:33 ` Al Viro
2012-03-05 21:46 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-05 22:02   ` Ted Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120305214621.GC29910@boyd \
    --to=tyhicks@canonical.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dustin.kirkland@gazzang.com \
    --cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox