From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
EDAC devel <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] EDAC core changes in order to properly report errors from all types of memory controllers
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:23:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120305232319.GA7175@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F553764.5070305@redhat.com>
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 07:00:04PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> With those changes, there's just one tracepont defined there, on this patchset:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-edac.git;a=commit;h=fdfa64045e43c942e1250708365d9240cd0da9c3
Ok, here's my take from simply skimming over the patchset for 5 mins:
* first of all, a lot of the patches are done sloppily and have no commit
messages whatsoever. This is a no-no and the first thing you need to fix.
* http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-edac.git;a=commitdiff;h=ad015450e549b29a74283733048254d3c647a33at is humongous, has no commit message and contains a lot of changes which probably deserve a patch of their own. Mauro, you're not doing this since yesterday, you should know better!
* http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-edac.git;a=commitdiff;h=ccca89bce4c0515aabd67440ba01ede97d2b4dcc removes crap introduced by earlier patches in the series, so also a no-no and needs to be fixed.
* WTF does the commit message of http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-edac.git;a=commitdiff;h=c911a426ef72c817222e7c2ab302a81b69ccbd07 mean? Looks like it redacts a huge function you've introduced in an earlier patch... Hell, no!
...
* And, last but not least, your patches touch amd64_edac* extensively,
and, I need to properly review those changes before they get committed.
So, my absolutely sincere suggestion to you is to split this huge
patchset into smaller patchsets containing 5-10 patches, making it much
easier to review, go over <Documentation/SubmittingPatches> and refresh
your knowledge on how a proper patch should look like and what it should
contain, test your stuff properly on the machines it addresses and
_only_ _then_ send them to the relevant parties for proper review - not
earlier.
HTH.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-05 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-02 14:25 [RFC -v2 PATCH 0/3] RAS: Use MCE tracepoint for decoded MCEs Borislav Petkov
2012-03-02 14:25 ` [PATCH 1/4] mce: Slim up struct mce Borislav Petkov
2012-03-02 17:47 ` Luck, Tony
2012-03-03 7:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-05 9:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-02 14:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] mce: Add a msg string to the MCE tracepoint Borislav Petkov
2012-03-02 14:25 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86, RAS: Add a decoded msg buffer Borislav Petkov
2012-03-02 14:25 ` [PATCH 4/4] EDAC: Convert AMD EDAC pieces to use RAS printk buffer Borislav Petkov
2012-03-02 14:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-05 11:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-05 11:43 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-05 12:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-05 13:35 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-05 14:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-05 14:58 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-05 22:00 ` [PATCHv5] EDAC core changes in order to properly report errors from all types of memory controllers Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-05 23:23 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-03-06 11:31 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-06 12:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-07 0:20 ` [PATCHv7] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-07 8:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-07 11:36 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-07 12:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-03-07 12:13 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-02 14:41 ` [RFC -v2 PATCH 0/3] RAS: Use MCE tracepoint for decoded MCEs Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-03-02 14:48 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120305232319.GA7175@aftab \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).