From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758220Ab2CFJZ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2012 04:25:58 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:59887 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757001Ab2CFJZz (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2012 04:25:55 -0500 Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of richardcochran@gmail.com designates 10.14.28.4 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=richardcochran@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=richardcochran@gmail.com Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:25:43 +0100 From: Richard Cochran To: David Miller Cc: tshimizu818@gmail.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, toshiharu-linux@dsn.okisemi.com, jdmason@kudzu.us, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qi.wang@intel.com, yong.y.wang@intel.com, joel.clark@intel.com, kok.howg.ewe@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/pch_gbe: supports eg20t ptp clock Message-ID: <20120306092542.GA28585@localhost.localdomain> References: <1330926377-11531-1-git-send-email-tshimizu818@gmail.com> <20120305.005709.1597475617000728984.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120305.005709.1597475617000728984.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:57:09AM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > So how the heck is this supposed to work? > > You post a patch for the e20tp clock source, you don't CC: netdev. > > Then you post this network driver patch which depends upon that on > and you do CC: netdev. > > You've made it impossible for me to apply them both properly into my > tree so that the dependency goes in. I'm confused. Are you talking about a patch from last August? In any case, if there two patches, then they should of course appear together. Thanks, Richard