From: David Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com, paulus@samba.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Barry <abarry@cray.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hugepages: Fix use after free bug in "quota" handling
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 01:18:16 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120308141816.GI10735@truffala.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878vjbaf3y.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 10:00:57AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:48:14 +1100, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
[snip]
> > out_free:
> > + if (sbinfo->spool)
> > + kfree(sbinfo->spool);
>
> kfree() should handle NULL
I've already changed that at akpm's suggestion.
> > @@ -53,6 +53,84 @@ static unsigned long __initdata default_hstate_size;
> > */
> > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(hugetlb_lock);
> >
> > +static inline void unlock_or_release_subpool(struct hugepage_subpool *spool)
> > +{
> > + bool free = (spool->count == 0) && (spool->used_hpages == 0);
> > +
>
> I have not see that style in other part of kernel. May be with proper
>
> if (spool->count == 0 && spool->used_hpages == 0)
> free = 1
>
> > + spin_unlock(&spool->lock);
> > +
>
>
> Having the spin_lock held across functions is also strange. Since there
> are only two callers, may be this can be inlined in the callers ?
It's a bit unusual, yes, but it seems to me clearer to outline this
operation in a function.
> > +static inline struct hugepage_subpool *subpool_inode(struct inode
> > *inode)
>
> s/subpool_inode/subpool_from_inode/ ?
>
> > +{
> > + return HUGETLBFS_SB(inode->i_sb)->spool;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline struct hugepage_subpool *subpool_vma(struct
> > vm_area_struct *vma)
>
> s/subpool_vma/subpool_from_vma/ ?
These functions are named to match hstate_inode() and hstate_vma().
> > +{
> > + return subpool_inode(vma->vm_file->f_dentry->d_inode);
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Region tracking -- allows tracking of reservations and instantiated pages
> > * across the pages in a mapping.
> > @@ -533,9 +611,9 @@ static void free_huge_page(struct page *page)
> > */
> > struct hstate *h = page_hstate(page);
> > int nid = page_to_nid(page);
> > - struct address_space *mapping;
> > + struct hugepage_subpool *spool =
> > + (struct hugepage_subpool *)page_private(page);
> >
> > - mapping = (struct address_space *) page_private(page);
> > set_page_private(page, 0);
> > page->mapping = NULL;
> > BUG_ON(page_count(page));
> > @@ -551,8 +629,7 @@ static void free_huge_page(struct page *page)
> > enqueue_huge_page(h, page);
> > }
> > spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> > - if (mapping)
> > - hugetlb_put_quota(mapping, 1);
> > + hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, 1);
>
>
> We would still need the if () checking there. When we do echo x >
> /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages we would call free_huge_page to prepare new
> huge page pool. But we don't have page_private set for them.
No, this is correct. hugepage_subpool_put_pages() is built to be a
nop if spool == NULL.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-08 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-07 4:48 [PATCH 1/2] Cleanup to hugetlb.h David Gibson
2012-03-07 4:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] hugepages: Fix use after free bug in "quota" handling David Gibson
2012-03-07 12:28 ` Hillf Danton
2012-03-08 0:57 ` David Gibson
2012-03-08 4:17 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-08 11:59 ` Hillf Danton
2012-03-08 14:19 ` David Gibson
2012-03-08 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-08 2:09 ` David Gibson
2012-03-09 3:25 ` David Gibson
2012-03-08 4:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-08 14:18 ` David Gibson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-16 4:23 Hugepage cleanup and bugfix David Gibson
2012-02-16 4:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] hugepages: Fix use after free bug in "quota" handling David Gibson
2012-02-16 12:33 ` Hillf Danton
2012-03-06 2:37 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120308141816.GI10735@truffala.fritz.box \
--to=dwg@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=abarry@cray.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).