From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758280Ab2CHQQ0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:16:26 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:62745 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756780Ab2CHQQX (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:16:23 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the omap_dss2 tree Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 16:16:12 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.3.0-rc1; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tomi Valkeinen , Tony Lindgren References: <20120308170048.f1a992bca2ca2d93fa9747bf@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20120308170048.f1a992bca2ca2d93fa9747bf@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203081616.12510.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:PNlWkx9PoxUCr5c6UoJfCfQvn9tRBeXlO24VFw5/BXR CEjUJHSQZ/aFqTDT43HWeOVvze9+LP7ThCpjEUaY6IFdx8tu8/ rcBL/eEa/jtwm51JyQwSsKBTEZ/ZODDuYhHkM7CGp9c9JkE2rR 0YZm9sovjp0EJs86dO8oLMJRhUf5rOuNP8o7kHqYTJlRVQk0Kv zNvTDfBwA/lf9tksET6SSRjp8LNeWIIm0pZ1wulO0A1kuVzB4v sgdKui+ZWZ4Nu6E2NZXXCTkG9g9pBVbTc0/xfLjHFTHL5Ry6OA DYo6UbAnFRNB3RiOpt6Aa8rITDPcXms2ZZRJUIzUC4ndBajIGm kz3Iw1pQBKk5TgumPZsc= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 08 March 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-palmtt.c between commit ddba6c7f7ec6 ("OMAP1: > pass LCD config with omapfb_set_lcd_config()") from the omap_dss2 tree > and commit 2e3ee9f45b3c ("ARM: OMAP1: Move most of plat/io.h into local > iomap.h") from the arm-soc tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Hi Stephen, Thanks for fixing up all the conflicts between arm-soc and omap_dss2. I think we should make sure they are resolved in one of the trees before the merge window. Tomi, what are your plans for the omap_dss2 branch to get merged? Do you think you should send it to Linus first and we merge it into arm-soc to resolve the conflicts? Or do you want to merge it through the arm-soc tree? Or should we go first and you fix up the conflicts by pulling in the necessary topic branches from arm-soc into your tree? Arnd