From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
axboe@kernel.dk, hughd@google.com, avi@redhat.com,
nate@cpanel.net, cl@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dpshah@google.com,
ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] mempool, percpu, blkcg: fix percpu stat allocation and remove stats_lock
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:22:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120308182245.GC22922@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120308181125.GB25508@google.com>
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 10:11:25AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 10:08:33AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > It's probably from something forgetting to put cgroup and pre_destroy
> > waiting for it. Such bugs would have been masked before but now show
> > up as stalls during rmdir. I'm not too happy with how cgroup is
> > handling cgroup file additions and removals and hoping to implement
> > proper 'sever' semantics similar to that of sysfs. In the longer
> > term, such behavior should go away but for now we'll just have to hunt
> > down the actual bug to avoid stalls (which we have to do anyway but
> > it's more visible now).
>
> Hmm... I'll probably need it for dynamic file additions and removals
> for dynamic policy updates && the blkcg changes are scheduled for
> 3.5-rc1 window (not 3.4-rc1), so we should have enough time to resolve
> this.
Does that mean in 3.4 we will continue to kill throttling groups and lose
all the policies and stats upon elevator change? So 3.4 will be one odd
release w.r.t this user visible change.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-08 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-23 22:30 [PATCHSET] mempool, percpu, blkcg: fix percpu stat allocation and remove stats_lock Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 1/8] mempool: factor out mempool_fill() Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 2/8] mempool: separate out __mempool_create() Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 3/8] mempool, percpu: implement percpu mempool Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 4/8] block: fix deadlock through percpu allocation in blk-cgroup Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 5/8] blkcg: don't use percpu for merged stats Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 6/8] blkcg: simplify stat reset Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] blkcg: restructure blkio_get_stat() Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 8/8] blkcg: remove blkio_group->stats_lock Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:43 ` [PATCHSET] mempool, percpu, blkcg: fix percpu stat allocation and remove stats_lock Andrew Morton
2012-02-23 23:01 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 23:12 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-23 23:24 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-24 14:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-25 21:44 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-27 3:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-27 9:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-27 19:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-29 17:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-05 22:13 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-06 21:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-06 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-06 21:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-06 21:55 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-07 14:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-07 17:05 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-07 19:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-07 19:22 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-07 19:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-07 22:56 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-07 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-07 23:15 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-07 23:05 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-08 17:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-08 18:08 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-08 18:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-08 18:22 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-03-08 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-15 16:48 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-15 16:59 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-20 11:50 ` Jens Axboe
2012-03-08 20:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-08 20:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-08 20:35 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-08 19:06 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-25 3:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-25 21:46 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-25 22:21 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-27 14:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-27 14:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-05 17:45 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-27 18:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-29 19:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-05 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-05 18:03 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120308182245.GC22922@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nate@cpanel.net \
--cc=rni@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).