public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Dilan Lee <dilee@nvidia.com>,
	Manjunath GKondaiah <manjunath.gkondaiah@linaro.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:22:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120308202218.GA31918@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1330962461-9061-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:47:41AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> Allow drivers to report at probe time that they cannot get all the resources
> required by the device, and should be retried at a later time.
> 
> This should completely solve the problem of getting devices
> initialized in the right order.  Right now this is mostly handled by
> mucking about with initcall ordering which is a complete hack, and
> doesn't even remotely handle the case where device drivers are in
> modules.  This approach completely sidesteps the issues by allowing
> driver registration to occur in any order, and any driver can request
> to be retried after a few more other drivers get probed.
> 
> v4: - Integrate Manjunath's addition of a separate workqueue
>     - Change -EAGAIN to -EPROBE_DEFER for drivers to trigger deferral
>     - Update comment blocks to reflect how the code really works
> v3: - Hold off workqueue scheduling until late_initcall so that the bulk
>       of driver probes are complete before we start retrying deferred devices.
>     - Tested with simple use cases.  Still needs more testing though.
>       Using it to get rid of the gpio early_initcall madness, or to replace
>       the ASoC internal probe deferral code would be ideal.
> v2: - added locking so it should no longer be utterly broken in that regard
>     - remove device from deferred list at device_del time.
>     - Still completely untested with any real use case, but has been
>       boot tested.

Now applied, thanks for pushing this and seeing it through.

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-08 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-05 15:47 [PATCH] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism Grant Likely
2012-03-05 17:38 ` Alan Cox
2012-03-05 17:40 ` David Daney
2012-03-05 17:50 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-05 19:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-05 21:10   ` Grant Likely
2012-03-05 21:24     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-03-05 21:28       ` Mark Brown
2012-03-06  9:10     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-05 21:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-03-05 22:09   ` Grant Likely
2012-03-05 22:15     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-03-06  0:08       ` Grant Likely
2012-03-06  5:28         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-03-06  7:52           ` Grant Likely
2012-03-08 20:22 ` Greg KH [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-04 17:11 Grant Likely
2011-07-04 17:41 ` Greg KH
2011-07-04 17:56   ` Mark Brown
2011-07-04 18:01   ` Grant Likely
2011-07-05 14:21     ` Greg KH
2011-07-05 15:21       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-05 15:50         ` Greg KH
2011-07-05 16:05           ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-05 16:27             ` Grant Likely
2011-07-05 16:11           ` Kay Sievers
2011-07-05 16:28             ` Grant Likely
2011-07-05 16:36               ` Greg KH
2011-07-05 17:17                 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-05 17:29                   ` Greg KH
2011-07-05 17:35                     ` Grant Likely
2011-07-10 14:24               ` Kay Sievers
2011-07-05 16:33             ` Grant Likely
2011-07-05 16:05       ` Grant Likely
2011-07-04 19:56 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-07-04 20:47 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-04 23:25   ` Grant Likely
2011-07-05  6:11     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120308202218.GA31918@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=dilee@nvidia.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manjunath.gkondaiah@linaro.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox