public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 4/4] genirq: Get rid of unnecessary IRQTF_DIED flag
@ 2012-03-09 13:59 Alexander Gordeev
  2012-03-09 15:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
  2012-03-09 21:13 ` [tip:irq/core] " tip-bot for Alexander Gordeev
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Gordeev @ 2012-03-09 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: Oleg Nesterov, linux-kernel

Currently IRQTF_DIED flag is set when a IRQ thread handler calls do_exit()
But also PF_EXITING per process flag gets set when a thread exits. This
fix eliminates the duplicate by using PF_EXITING flag.

Also, there is a race condition in exit_irq_thread(). In case a thread's
bit is cleared in desc->threads_oneshot (and the IRQ line gets unmasked),
but before IRQTF_DIED flag is set, a new interrupt might come in and set
just cleared bit again, this time forever. This fix throws IRQTF_DIED flag
away, eliminating the race as a result.

Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/exit.c          |    4 ++--
 kernel/irq/handle.c    |    4 ++--
 kernel/irq/internals.h |    2 --
 kernel/irq/manage.c    |   11 +----------
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 4b4042f..752d2c0 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -935,8 +935,6 @@ void do_exit(long code)
 		schedule();
 	}
 
-	exit_irq_thread();
-
 	exit_signals(tsk);  /* sets PF_EXITING */
 	/*
 	 * tsk->flags are checked in the futex code to protect against
@@ -945,6 +943,8 @@ void do_exit(long code)
 	smp_mb();
 	raw_spin_unlock_wait(&tsk->pi_lock);
 
+	exit_irq_thread();
+
 	if (unlikely(in_atomic()))
 		printk(KERN_INFO "note: %s[%d] exited with preempt_count %d\n",
 				current->comm, task_pid_nr(current),
diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
index 470d08c..42a32ec 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ static void irq_wake_thread(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
 	 * device interrupt, so no irq storm is lurking. If the
 	 * RUNTHREAD bit is already set, nothing to do.
 	 */
-	if (test_bit(IRQTF_DIED, &action->thread_flags) ||
-	    test_and_set_bit(IRQTF_RUNTHREAD, &action->thread_flags))
+	if (test_and_set_bit(IRQTF_RUNTHREAD, &action->thread_flags) ||
+	    (action->thread->flags & PF_EXITING))
 		return;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/kernel/irq/internals.h b/kernel/irq/internals.h
index b795231..5c233e0 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/internals.h
+++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h
@@ -20,14 +20,12 @@ extern bool noirqdebug;
 /*
  * Bits used by threaded handlers:
  * IRQTF_RUNTHREAD - signals that the interrupt handler thread should run
- * IRQTF_DIED      - handler thread died
  * IRQTF_WARNED    - warning "IRQ_WAKE_THREAD w/o thread_fn" has been printed
  * IRQTF_AFFINITY  - irq thread is requested to adjust affinity
  * IRQTF_FORCED_THREAD  - irq action is force threaded
  */
 enum {
 	IRQTF_RUNTHREAD,
-	IRQTF_DIED,
 	IRQTF_WARNED,
 	IRQTF_AFFINITY,
 	IRQTF_FORCED_THREAD,
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 3feab4a..a94466d 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -845,17 +845,8 @@ void exit_irq_thread(void)
 
 	desc = irq_to_desc(action->irq);
 
-	/*
-	 * Prevent a stale desc->threads_oneshot. Must be called
-	 * before setting the IRQTF_DIED flag.
-	 */
+	/* Prevent a stale desc->threads_oneshot */
 	irq_finalize_oneshot(desc, action, true);
-
-	/*
-	 * Set the THREAD DIED flag to prevent further wakeups of the
-	 * soon to be gone threaded handler.
-	 */
-	set_bit(IRQTF_DIED, &action->flags);
 }
 
 static void irq_setup_forced_threading(struct irqaction *new)
-- 
1.7.7.6


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/4] genirq: Get rid of unnecessary IRQTF_DIED flag
  2012-03-09 13:59 [PATCH 4/4] genirq: Get rid of unnecessary IRQTF_DIED flag Alexander Gordeev
@ 2012-03-09 15:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
  2012-03-09 16:17   ` Thomas Gleixner
  2012-03-09 21:13 ` [tip:irq/core] " tip-bot for Alexander Gordeev
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2012-03-09 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexander Gordeev; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, linux-kernel

Of course I can't ack this, but afaics the whole series looks fine.

Only one minor nit,

On 03/09, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
>
> --- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> @@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ static void irq_wake_thread(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
>  	 * device interrupt, so no irq storm is lurking. If the
>  	 * RUNTHREAD bit is already set, nothing to do.
>  	 */
> -	if (test_bit(IRQTF_DIED, &action->thread_flags) ||
> -	    test_and_set_bit(IRQTF_RUNTHREAD, &action->thread_flags))
> +	if (test_and_set_bit(IRQTF_RUNTHREAD, &action->thread_flags) ||
> +	    (action->thread->flags & PF_EXITING))
>  		return;

perhaps it makes sense to check PF_EXITING first, we do not want
to set IRQTF_RUNTHREAD in this case. I think this doesn't really
matter (and the check is obviously racy anyway), just looks a bit
confusing.

Oleg.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/4] genirq: Get rid of unnecessary IRQTF_DIED flag
  2012-03-09 15:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
@ 2012-03-09 16:17   ` Thomas Gleixner
  2012-03-12 11:38     ` Alexander Gordeev
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2012-03-09 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oleg Nesterov; +Cc: Alexander Gordeev, linux-kernel

On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> Of course I can't ack this, but afaics the whole series looks fine.
> 
> Only one minor nit,
> 
> On 03/09, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> >
> > --- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
> > +++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> > @@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ static void irq_wake_thread(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
> >  	 * device interrupt, so no irq storm is lurking. If the
> >  	 * RUNTHREAD bit is already set, nothing to do.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (test_bit(IRQTF_DIED, &action->thread_flags) ||
> > -	    test_and_set_bit(IRQTF_RUNTHREAD, &action->thread_flags))
> > +	if (test_and_set_bit(IRQTF_RUNTHREAD, &action->thread_flags) ||
> > +	    (action->thread->flags & PF_EXITING))
> >  		return;
> 
> perhaps it makes sense to check PF_EXITING first, we do not want
> to set IRQTF_RUNTHREAD in this case. I think this doesn't really
> matter (and the check is obviously racy anyway), just looks a bit
> confusing.

It does not matter, the thread cleans it up in the exit path. So it's
mostly cosmetic, but you are right, it reads better :)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [tip:irq/core] genirq: Get rid of unnecessary IRQTF_DIED flag
  2012-03-09 13:59 [PATCH 4/4] genirq: Get rid of unnecessary IRQTF_DIED flag Alexander Gordeev
  2012-03-09 15:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
@ 2012-03-09 21:13 ` tip-bot for Alexander Gordeev
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Alexander Gordeev @ 2012-03-09 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: linux-kernel, agordeev, hpa, mingo, oleg, tglx

Commit-ID:  5234ffb9f74cfa8993d174782bc861dd9b7b5bfb
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/5234ffb9f74cfa8993d174782bc861dd9b7b5bfb
Author:     Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:59:59 +0100
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:19:09 +0100

genirq: Get rid of unnecessary IRQTF_DIED flag

Currently IRQTF_DIED flag is set when a IRQ thread handler calls do_exit()
But also PF_EXITING per process flag gets set when a thread exits. This
fix eliminates the duplicate by using PF_EXITING flag.

Also, there is a race condition in exit_irq_thread(). In case a thread's
bit is cleared in desc->threads_oneshot (and the IRQ line gets unmasked),
but before IRQTF_DIED flag is set, a new interrupt might come in and set
just cleared bit again, this time forever. This fix throws IRQTF_DIED flag
away, eliminating the race as a result.

[ tglx: Test THREAD_EXITING first as suggested by Oleg ]

Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120309135958.GD2114@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/exit.c          |    4 ++--
 kernel/irq/handle.c    |    2 +-
 kernel/irq/internals.h |    2 --
 kernel/irq/manage.c    |   11 +----------
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 4b4042f..752d2c0 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -935,8 +935,6 @@ void do_exit(long code)
 		schedule();
 	}
 
-	exit_irq_thread();
-
 	exit_signals(tsk);  /* sets PF_EXITING */
 	/*
 	 * tsk->flags are checked in the futex code to protect against
@@ -945,6 +943,8 @@ void do_exit(long code)
 	smp_mb();
 	raw_spin_unlock_wait(&tsk->pi_lock);
 
+	exit_irq_thread();
+
 	if (unlikely(in_atomic()))
 		printk(KERN_INFO "note: %s[%d] exited with preempt_count %d\n",
 				current->comm, task_pid_nr(current),
diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
index 470d08c..500aaf6 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static void irq_wake_thread(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
 	 * device interrupt, so no irq storm is lurking. If the
 	 * RUNTHREAD bit is already set, nothing to do.
 	 */
-	if (test_bit(IRQTF_DIED, &action->thread_flags) ||
+	if ((action->thread->flags & PF_EXITING) ||
 	    test_and_set_bit(IRQTF_RUNTHREAD, &action->thread_flags))
 		return;
 
diff --git a/kernel/irq/internals.h b/kernel/irq/internals.h
index b795231..5c233e0 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/internals.h
+++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h
@@ -20,14 +20,12 @@ extern bool noirqdebug;
 /*
  * Bits used by threaded handlers:
  * IRQTF_RUNTHREAD - signals that the interrupt handler thread should run
- * IRQTF_DIED      - handler thread died
  * IRQTF_WARNED    - warning "IRQ_WAKE_THREAD w/o thread_fn" has been printed
  * IRQTF_AFFINITY  - irq thread is requested to adjust affinity
  * IRQTF_FORCED_THREAD  - irq action is force threaded
  */
 enum {
 	IRQTF_RUNTHREAD,
-	IRQTF_DIED,
 	IRQTF_WARNED,
 	IRQTF_AFFINITY,
 	IRQTF_FORCED_THREAD,
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 3feab4a..a94466d 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -845,17 +845,8 @@ void exit_irq_thread(void)
 
 	desc = irq_to_desc(action->irq);
 
-	/*
-	 * Prevent a stale desc->threads_oneshot. Must be called
-	 * before setting the IRQTF_DIED flag.
-	 */
+	/* Prevent a stale desc->threads_oneshot */
 	irq_finalize_oneshot(desc, action, true);
-
-	/*
-	 * Set the THREAD DIED flag to prevent further wakeups of the
-	 * soon to be gone threaded handler.
-	 */
-	set_bit(IRQTF_DIED, &action->flags);
 }
 
 static void irq_setup_forced_threading(struct irqaction *new)

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/4] genirq: Get rid of unnecessary IRQTF_DIED flag
  2012-03-09 16:17   ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2012-03-12 11:38     ` Alexander Gordeev
  2012-03-12 15:10       ` Alexander Gordeev
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Gordeev @ 2012-03-12 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Oleg Nesterov; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 05:17:16PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 
> > Of course I can't ack this, but afaics the whole series looks fine.
> > 
> > Only one minor nit,
> > 
> > On 03/09, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > >
> > > --- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> > > @@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ static void irq_wake_thread(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
> > >  	 * device interrupt, so no irq storm is lurking. If the
> > >  	 * RUNTHREAD bit is already set, nothing to do.
> > >  	 */
> > > -	if (test_bit(IRQTF_DIED, &action->thread_flags) ||
> > > -	    test_and_set_bit(IRQTF_RUNTHREAD, &action->thread_flags))
> > > +	if (test_and_set_bit(IRQTF_RUNTHREAD, &action->thread_flags) ||
> > > +	    (action->thread->flags & PF_EXITING))
> > >  		return;
> > 
> > perhaps it makes sense to check PF_EXITING first, we do not want
> > to set IRQTF_RUNTHREAD in this case. I think this doesn't really
> > matter (and the check is obviously racy anyway), just looks a bit
> > confusing.
> 
> It does not matter, the thread cleans it up in the exit path. So it's
> mostly cosmetic, but you are right, it reads better :)

Oleg, Thomas,

I swapped the checks because I wanted to avoid this scenario:


CPU1                        CPU2

                            do_exit()
                              exit_signals(tsk);  /* sets PF_EXITING */
                              smp_mb(); <--------------------------------+
                              exit_irq_thread();                         |
                                irq_finalize_oneshot();                  |
                                  desc->threads_oneshot &= ~action->thread_mask;
                                  unmask_irq(desc);                      |
                                                                         |
/* Once the irq is unmasked new interrupt can come... */                 |
                                                                         |
irq_wake_thread()                                                        |
                                                                         |
  /* To notice PF_EXITING has changed a call to smp_rmb() should be here |
   * to pair with smp_mb() in do_exit() ---------------------------------+
   * But it is not, and the condition might not fulfill.
   * Hence the thread might not return, although it should.
   */
  if ((action->thread->flags & PF_EXITING) ||
      test_and_set_bit(IRQTF_RUNTHREAD, &action->thread_flags))
          return;
  ...

  /* And would be stalled bit will be mistakenly set */
  desc->threads_oneshot |= action->thread_mask;


Given that PF_EXITING check almost never fulfills but always gets executed and
test_and_set_bit() is a smp general barrier I thought swapping of PF_EXITING vs
IRQTF_RUNTHREAD checks is better than putting explicit smp_rmb().

If my considerations are flawed I will repost the patch with the original
order as it indeed reads better :)

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@redhat.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/4] genirq: Get rid of unnecessary IRQTF_DIED flag
  2012-03-12 11:38     ` Alexander Gordeev
@ 2012-03-12 15:10       ` Alexander Gordeev
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Gordeev @ 2012-03-12 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: Oleg Nesterov, linux-kernel

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:

> If my considerations are flawed I will repost the patch with the original
> order as it indeed reads better :)

Thomas, please nevermind my last note.

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@redhat.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-12 15:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-09 13:59 [PATCH 4/4] genirq: Get rid of unnecessary IRQTF_DIED flag Alexander Gordeev
2012-03-09 15:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-09 16:17   ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-12 11:38     ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-03-12 15:10       ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-03-09 21:13 ` [tip:irq/core] " tip-bot for Alexander Gordeev

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox