From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes/core: handle breakpoint and signal step exception.
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:20:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120313052016.GA27824@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120309073348.GA15570@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> [2012-03-08 14:48:09]:
> >
> > >
> > > * Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > @@ -233,9 +233,11 @@ static inline void __user *arch_compat_alloc_user_space(long len)
> > > >
> > > > if (test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32)) {
> > > > sp = task_pt_regs(current)->sp;
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > > > } else {
> > > > /* -128 for the x32 ABI redzone */
> > > > sp = __this_cpu_read(old_rsp) - 128;
> > > > +#endif
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > return (void __user *)round_down(sp - len, 16);
> > >
> > > So 'sp' is undefined if that TIF check fails?
> > >
> > > Also, on a 32-bit kernel the TIF check probably fails all the
> > > time, because we don't set TIF_IA32 (and don't know that flag).
> >
> > >
> > > It would probably be better to make the whole helper inline
> > > #ifdef 64-bit, it does not look very useful on 32-bit.
> > >
> >
> > arch_compat_alloc_user_space gets called from compat_alloc_user_space
> > which is arch agnostic and exported too.
> >
> > So I will change this to
> >
> > void __user *arch_compat_alloc_user_space(long len)
> > {
> > if (is_ia32_compat_task(current))
> > sp = task_pt_regs(current)->sp;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > else
> > /* -128 for the x32 ABI redzone */
> > sp = __this_cpu_read(old_rsp) - 128;
> > #endif
> >
> > return (void __user *)round_down(sp - len, 16);
> > }
> >
> > where is_ia32_compat_task() is the new macro that you
> > suggested we put in compat.h which would return true if the
> > task is 32 bit emulated on x86_64 or running on i386 machine.
> >
> > Hence we can avoid the case where sp is not set.
>
> Ok - looks good at first glance.
It does not look good on a second glance though, once I checked
your latest patches.
arch_compat_alloc_user_space() is arch agnostic on
*CONFIG_COMPAT=y* kernels.
It's generally not available on 32-bit builds - CONFIG_COMPAT is
a facility to provide 32-bit syscall compatibility on 64-bit
kernels. Such a facility is not needed on 32-bit kernels.
So providing this:
> void __user *arch_compat_alloc_user_space(long len)
> {
> if (is_ia32_compat_task(current))
> sp = task_pt_regs(current)->sp;
on 32-bit systems makes little sense.
So ... instead of adding is_compat_task() to compat.h it would
be better to add it to another x86 header (processor.h might be
good but I have not checked very hard) and maybe name it
is_32bit_task() or so, to make sure there's no confusion with
CONFIG_COMPAT=y methods.
I.e. you could drop this patch altogether:
x86/trivial: Fix 'old_rsp' undefined build failure when including asm/compat.h
And rework the is_ia32_compat_task() patch to use another header
and to use the is_32bit_task() name. Also, you should double
check whether the x32 execution model needs special
consideration as well:
#define TIF_IA32 17 /* IA32 compatibility process */
#define TIF_X32 30 /* 32-bit native x86-64 binary */
otherwise uprobe will not work with x32 tasks properly.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-13 5:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-23 11:02 [PATCH] uprobes/core: handle breakpoint and signal step exception Srikar Dronamraju
2012-02-23 12:18 ` Anton Arapov
2012-02-24 5:31 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-02-27 9:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-28 13:26 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-02-28 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-28 14:17 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-02-28 14:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-08 13:18 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-03-08 13:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-09 6:28 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-03-09 7:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 5:20 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-03-13 5:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 5:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-13 9:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-03-13 9:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-27 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120313052016.GA27824@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jistone@redhat.com \
--cc=jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).