linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:10:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120313141032.GD29169@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120312230416.GM23255@google.com>

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 04:04:16PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:44:01PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 15:39 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > If we can get to the point where nesting is fully
> > > supported by every controller first, that would be awesome too. 
> > 
> > As long as that is the goal.. otherwise, I'd be overjoyed if I can rip
> > nesting support out of the cpu-controller.. that stuff is such a pain.
> > Then again, I don't think the container people like this proposal --
> > they were the ones pushing for full hierarchy back when.
> 
> Yeah, the great pain of full hierarchy support is one of the reasons
> why I keep thinking about supporting mapping to flat hierarchy.  Full
> hierarchy could be too painful and not useful enough for some
> controllers.  Then again, cpu and memcg already have it and according
> to Vivek blkcg also had a proposed implementation, so maybe it's okay.
> Let's see.

Implementing hierarchy is a pain and is expensive at run time. Supporting
flat structure will provide path for smooth transition.

We had some RFC patches for blkcg hierarchy and that made things even more
complicated and we might not gain much. So why to complicate the code
until and unless we have a good use case.

Thanks
Vivek

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-13 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-21 21:19 [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies Tejun Heo
2012-02-21 21:21 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-22 13:34   ` Glauber Costa
2012-02-23  7:45     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2012-02-23 17:29       ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 18:47         ` Serge Hallyn
2012-02-26  4:59   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-22 13:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-22 13:37   ` Glauber Costa
2012-02-22 18:01   ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23  7:39   ` Li Zefan
2012-02-22 15:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-22 18:22   ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-27 17:46     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-22 16:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-22 16:57   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-22 18:43     ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23  9:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-23 14:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-01 17:19         ` Michal Schmidt
2012-03-01 18:03           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-02 11:08             ` Michal Schmidt
2012-03-02 11:23               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-02 11:28                 ` Michal Schmidt
2012-03-02 11:34                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-01 20:26           ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-01 21:02             ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-01 22:04               ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-01 22:38                 ` C Anthony Risinger
2012-03-02 10:51                 ` Michal Schmidt
2012-03-02 11:52                   ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-05 12:43                 ` Lennart Poettering
2012-03-05 15:47                   ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-05 19:58                     ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-02  2:43             ` Kay Sievers
2012-03-02 10:15               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-02 11:16             ` Michal Schmidt
2012-03-02 11:24               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-23 21:38       ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-23 22:34         ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-28 21:16           ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-28 21:21             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-28 21:35               ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-28 21:43                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-28 21:54                   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-28 22:00                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-28 22:31                       ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-28 21:53                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-28 22:09                   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-24 11:33         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-22 18:33   ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 19:41     ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-23 22:38       ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23  7:59   ` Li Zefan
2012-02-23 20:32     ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-23  8:22 ` Li Zefan
2012-02-23 17:33   ` Tejun Heo
     [not found] ` <m162em2efy.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
2012-03-03 14:26   ` Serge Hallyn
2012-03-05 11:37 ` Lennart Poettering
2012-03-12 22:10 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-12 22:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-12 22:28     ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-12 22:31       ` Lennart Poettering
2012-03-12 23:00         ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-12 23:02           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-12 23:09             ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-12 23:43             ` Lennart Poettering
2012-03-12 22:32       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-12 22:39         ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-12 22:44           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-12 23:04             ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-13 14:10               ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-03-13 16:11                 ` C Anthony Risinger
2012-03-13 16:30                   ` C Anthony Risinger
2012-03-13 17:25                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-13 17:31                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-13 10:11             ` Glauber Costa
2012-03-13 14:03       ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-13 15:59         ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-16 23:14           ` James Bottomley
2012-03-12 22:37   ` Serge Hallyn
2012-03-12 22:55     ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-13 13:49   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-13 16:02     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120313141032.GD29169@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=lennart@poettering.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mschmidt@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).