From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: crash dump memory reservation regression
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:26:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120313142624.GE29169@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQU9C=5YAa3DPcx8E9yVckSX5JbLdS=TC90jA8wz1pjzmw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:31:21PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
[..]
> 3. fix kdump, and make kdump could take two ranges, one is small
> segment below 512M, other part could be more than 4G.
I will prefer to avoid supporting split memory range for kdump memory.
This will make the kdump solution complicated and we might not have
much to gain.
In general focus is to reserve as less a memory as possible for kdump
kernel. Currently for x86, we reserve 128M adhoc block by default and
scale it up by 64MB per 1TB of physical RAM (dump filtering utility
requires 2bits of memory per 4K physical page).
So as long as we can reserve till 512MB of kdump memory, that should allow
us to support up to 6TB of systems with dump filtering. Hopefully that is
sufficient for quite some time and we don't have to take the path of
supporting non-contiguous memory for kdump.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-13 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5535e246-b7c0-4f69-a27b-1abbadd42db0@zmail14.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2012-03-12 3:00 ` crash dump memory reservation regression CAI Qian
2012-03-13 5:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-13 5:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-31 15:59 ` Shuah Khan
2012-08-31 16:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-31 16:42 ` Takashi Iwai
2012-08-31 16:50 ` Shuah Khan
2012-03-13 14:26 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-03-13 21:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-21 8:17 ` Dave Young
2012-03-26 10:32 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120313142624.GE29169@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox