From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758934Ab2CNHuG (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:50:06 -0400 Received: from 6.mo2.mail-out.ovh.net ([87.98.165.38]:55014 "EHLO mo2.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756080Ab2CNHuC (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:50:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:30:35 +0100 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD To: Rob Herring Cc: Sascha Hauer , Dong Aisheng , vinod.koul@linux.intel.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, rdunlap@xenotime.net, kernel@pengutronix.de, cjb@laptop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.2 (mo2.mail-out.ovh.net) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] ARM: imx28evk: add mmc dt support Message-ID: <20120314073035.GI18320@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <1331628428-24017-1-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <1331628428-24017-4-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <4F5F5C22.1080506@gmail.com> <20120313165214.GO26642@pengutronix.de> <4F5F879E.4030407@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F5F879E.4030407@gmail.com> X-PGP-Key: http://uboot.jcrosoft.org/plagnioj.asc X-PGP-key-fingerprint: 6309 2BBA 16C8 3A07 1772 CC24 DEFC FFA3 279C CE7C User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 5468214373213842396 X-Ovh-Remote: 213.251.161.87 (ns32433.ovh.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeegvddrfeejucetggdotefuucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecuhfhrohhmpeflvggrnhdqvehhrhhishhtohhphhgvucfrnfetiffpkffqnfdqggfknffnteftffcuoehplhgrghhnihhojhesjhgtrhhoshhofhhtrdgtohhmqeenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdfttddtredv X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeegvddrfeejucetggdotefuucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecuhfhrohhmpeflvggrnhdqvehhrhhishhtohhphhgvucfrnfetiffpkffqnfdqggfknffnteftffcuoehplhgrghhnihhojhesjhgtrhhoshhofhhtrdgtohhmqeenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdfttddtredv Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12:45 Tue 13 Mar , Rob Herring wrote: > On 03/13/2012 11:52 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:39:30AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > >> On 03/13/2012 03:47 AM, Dong Aisheng wrote: > >>> From: Dong Aisheng > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > >>> --- > >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++ > >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> arch/arm/mach-mxs/imx28-dt.c | 2 ++ > >>> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > >> snip > >> > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/imx28-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/imx28-dt.c > >>> index 78d1129..429b88e 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/imx28-dt.c > >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/imx28-dt.c > >>> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ static const struct of_dev_auxdata imx28_auxdata_lookup[] __initconst = { > >>> OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl011", MX28_DUART_BASE_ADDR, "duart", NULL), > >>> OF_DEV_AUXDATA("fsl,imx28-fec", MX28_ENET_MAC0_BASE_ADDR, "imx28-fec.0", NULL), > >>> OF_DEV_AUXDATA("fsl,imx28-fec", MX28_ENET_MAC1_BASE_ADDR, "imx28-fec.1", NULL), > >>> + OF_DEV_AUXDATA("fsl,imx28-mmc", MX28_SSP0_BASE_ADDR, "mxs-mmc.0", NULL), > >>> + OF_DEV_AUXDATA("fsl,imx28-mmc", MX28_SSP1_BASE_ADDR, "mxs-mmc.1", NULL), > >> > >> Why is this needed? > > > > These are needed for the drivers which have still the mxs-mmc.* names > > to find their clocks. Alternatively we could also add the appropriate > > clocks to the clock file. Don't know if that's better though. > > Ah, yes I should have known that... If clk lookup is all that's needed, > I'd suggest adding the necessary clk lookups either here or in the clock > code. Not much difference, but at least it removes the use of > *_BASE_ADDR defines. Agreed we do this on AT91 Best Regards, J.