From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755477Ab2CNLR3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:17:29 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:50059 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753589Ab2CNLRX (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:17:23 -0400 From: Marek Vasut To: Dong Aisheng Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mmc: mxs-mmc: add dt probe support Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:17:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "Dong Aisheng-B29396" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "vinod.koul@linux.intel.com" , "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "rdunlap@xenotime.net" , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , "cjb@laptop.org" , "Guo Shawn-R65073" References: <1331628428-24017-1-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <201203140809.22676.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <20120314072603.GC8494@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net> In-Reply-To: <20120314072603.GC8494@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203141217.19842.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dear Dong Aisheng, > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:09:22AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Dong Aisheng, > > > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:58:25PM +0800, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > Dear Dong Aisheng, > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > > > > > ........ > > > > > > > > +static const struct of_device_id mxs_mmc_dt_ids[] = { > > > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx23-mmc", .data = NULL, }, > > > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx28-mmc", .data = NULL, }, > > > > > > > > Do you really need two distinct ones here? > > > > > > Hmm, my original purpose is to put soc difference data in .data > > > to remove cpu_is_* function calls in the driver later. > > > Do you think if any issue? > > > > Well, what's the difference between the interfaces on mx233 and mx28? Is > > it something that can't be encoded otherwise? I think they're not so > > different. > > Not much difference except the one register offset and ip version. > See: > #define SSP_VERSION_LATEST 4 > #define ssp_is_old() (host->version < SSP_VERSION_LATEST) > .. > #define HW_SSP_VERSION (cpu_is_mx23() ? 0x110 : 0x130) > The ip version can be handled in driver, but for offset... > it depends on cpu_is_* macro. > Putting the HW_SSP_VERSION offset difference in .data can eliminate the > need of cpu_is_*. > > Despite of that, since they're two devices, > i guess it's ok to put two compatible string there, right? > Or you thought just put one as below? > { .compatible = "fsl,mxs-mmc", .data = NULL, }, > No, I understand now /wrt the register layout. Best regards, Marek Vasut