From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] rcu: Limit GP initialization to CPUs that have been online
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:17:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120314151717.GA2435@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120314130801.GA11722@sgi.com>
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:08:01AM -0500, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:40:41PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 10:24 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 17:24 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > The following builds, but is only very lightly tested. Probably full
> > > > of bug, especially when exercising CPU hotplug.
> > >
> > > You didn't say RFT, but...
> > >
> > > To beat on this in a rotund 3.0 kernel, the equivalent patch would be
> > > the below? My box may well answer that before you can.. hope not ;-)
> >
> > (Darn, it did. Box says boot stall with virgin patch in tip too though.
> > Wedging it straight into 3.0 was perhaps a tad premature;)
>
> I saw the same thing with 3.3.0-rc7+ and virgin patch on UV. Boots fine without the patch.
Right... Bozo here forgot to set the kernel parameters for large-system
emulation during testing. Apologies for the busted patch, will fix.
And thank you both for the testing!!!
Hey, at least I labeled it "RFC". ;-)
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-14 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-14 0:24 [PATCH RFC] rcu: Limit GP initialization to CPUs that have been online Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-14 9:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-14 12:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-14 13:08 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-14 15:17 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-03-14 16:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-15 2:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-15 3:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-15 17:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-15 17:21 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 4:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-15 17:59 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 7:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-16 8:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-16 8:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-16 17:28 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 17:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-16 17:56 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 19:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-22 15:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-22 20:24 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-23 4:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-23 19:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-11 11:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-13 18:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-14 5:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-15 17:58 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-15 18:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-15 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-16 15:46 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 17:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-14 17:07 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120314151717.GA2435@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox