From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761290Ab2CNRpZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:45:25 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:38389 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761145Ab2CNRpV (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:45:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:45:18 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: Tomoya MORINAGA , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, qi.wang@intel.com, Takashi Iwai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yong.y.wang@intel.com, kok.howg.ewe@intel.com, Liam Girdwood , joel.clark@intel.com Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v6] sound/soc/codecs: add LAPIS Semiconductor ML26124 Message-ID: <20120314174518.GV3133@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20120302125819.GE3230@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120306100012.GC19635@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120306121222.GK19635@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120307114811.GF3107@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4F60D804.30804@metafoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZUxj+kVYsk1YKJSS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F60D804.30804@metafoo.de> X-Cookie: It's all in the mind, ya know. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ZUxj+kVYsk1YKJSS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:40:20PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > If this is for all registers, how does stuff like DAPM work, which uses the > framework internal update_bits function? I was assuming that this was just for specific registers which were weird (frankly I've no idea what the chip designers were thinking if this is actually needed). Though based on some of the issues I found on previous versions there's every chance that there's not been any testing... if that's the case it's possible this is a misunderstanding of the I2C read/write handling with the chip address? --ZUxj+kVYsk1YKJSS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPYNknAAoJEBus8iNuMP3d2vgP/jhn2e0LB6ofGvFXjy1KxyK1 jgMski1XZi2xR2PtXu654e10fR7u4Tl5InaMXTSjKHOv0ubWVqFGJP20zBd8K0XD SL5VkaPE1CZrmLDoNdy9AMzxmW8jxN1ZuMPW9jLm39er2ntcvS5yA/IWpMRKesHu dNhiDT+XlqJ4+GxNO7SjleEfct36WEDsJv21w0XWFHMvjbmZ5cCxNcAYLEbJkWsq h99dPtl23272F5E9crshR9DqfOBXxzYvI2o+suFJXVLk3Wz5azYqfMlGbpElc/N5 iri7InICjfJGgC54g8xKQMU5jA4BbvdGFmlcNDn8swelaVKMoL18YL4OoIzJhBGb W1+f5AkJDdFQGN0dFdIaNzJNO+PdbOxIvbKqZM3c5AUxF0lh9liblKHKSMoFuzt4 soIdYMNvbQXMYcQlbJHJ4+c0ARPhlRg5iK1S48LVCd9qnH8Mz+JJZPV7iB96b/oA Y4jgQiZOqfLlZh1X6wolCJl3LgtGTq7Ivr1xwDe7BsPoKNysjiS0eIqIubzeCqzM giVeRsooToEzubXxbRDdFe/6ofqaoFN1rzKG6Ei+VZCGPOn0z2kV738V4j4TFcqS rVKWo/V6HejqbM759aNnYLenigF3817kEMz5XzncyZ+xKAKRPHtVZ7o5C5NGBxGN FDYkO45EhRU8PiuPfcLX =0iQb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZUxj+kVYsk1YKJSS--