From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762068Ab2COS4z (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:56:55 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:41244 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762033Ab2COS4w (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:56:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:56:48 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Pete Zaitcev , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/ub: deprecate & schedule for removal the "Low Performance USB Block" driver Message-ID: <20120315185648.GC11142@kroah.com> References: <1331758372-9851-1-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> <20120315093331.6472333e@lembas.zaitcev.lan> <20120315153747.GA23515@kroah.com> <20120315181045.GB5702@breakpoint.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120315181045.GB5702@breakpoint.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:10:45PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > Although the above is false, and ub actually started libusual, > > > I don't mind. It's a transient notice anyway. Once ub is gone, > > > libusual can be folded back into usb-storage. > > > > Good point. > > > > Sebastian, care to reword this and resend it? > I want clarify one thing but sure. > > > Also, are you going to be doing the "merge libusual into usb-storage" > > after you remove the ub driver? > > This sounds like once ub is out, you have to merge those two :) So yes, unless > a use case for it comes up. I'll take patches from you to do this, as the removal patch of ub will make libusual not need to be stand-alone. And you will be the one sending the ub removal patch in 6 months, right? thanks, greg k-h