From: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Tu, Xiaobing" <xiaobing.tu@intel.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: "alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>,
"Du, Alek" <alek.du@intel.com>, "Zuo, Jiao" <jiao.zuo@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: hold lock across tty buffer finding and buffer filling
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:14:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120316201445.GA1240@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EE928378561BF1449699C96571234A740FCC5EC3@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Jiri,
Do you have any objections to me applying the patch below?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 03:00:26AM +0000, Tu, Xiaobing wrote:
> From: Xiaobing Tu <xiaobing.tu@intel.com>
>
> tty_buffer_request_room is well protected, but while after it returns,
> it releases the port->lock. tty->buf.tail might be modified
> by either irq handler or other threads. The patch adds more protection
> by holding the lock across tty buffer finding and buffer filling.
> Signed-off-by: Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaobing Tu <xiaobing.tu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
> index 6c9b7cd..91e326f 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
> @@ -185,25 +185,19 @@ static struct tty_buffer *tty_buffer_find(struct tty_struct *tty, size_t size)
> /* Should possibly check if this fails for the largest buffer we
> have queued and recycle that ? */
> }
> -
> /**
> - * tty_buffer_request_room - grow tty buffer if needed
> + * __tty_buffer_request_room - grow tty buffer if needed
> * @tty: tty structure
> * @size: size desired
> *
> * Make at least size bytes of linear space available for the tty
> * buffer. If we fail return the size we managed to find.
> - *
> - * Locking: Takes tty->buf.lock
> + * Locking: Caller must hold tty->buf.lock
> */
> -int tty_buffer_request_room(struct tty_struct *tty, size_t size)
> +static int __tty_buffer_request_room(struct tty_struct *tty, size_t size)
> {
> struct tty_buffer *b, *n;
> int left;
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->buf.lock, flags);
> -
> /* OPTIMISATION: We could keep a per tty "zero" sized buffer to
> remove this conditional if its worth it. This would be invisible
> to the callers */
> @@ -225,9 +219,30 @@ int tty_buffer_request_room(struct tty_struct *tty, size_t size)
> size = left;
> }
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->buf.lock, flags);
> return size;
> }
> +
> +
> +/**
> + * tty_buffer_request_room - grow tty buffer if needed
> + * @tty: tty structure
> + * @size: size desired
> + *
> + * Make at least size bytes of linear space available for the tty
> + * buffer. If we fail return the size we managed to find.
> + *
> + * Locking: Takes tty->buf.lock
> + */
> +int tty_buffer_request_room(struct tty_struct *tty, size_t size)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int length;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->buf.lock, flags);
> + length = __tty_buffer_request_room(tty, size);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->buf.lock, flags);
> + return length;
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tty_buffer_request_room);
>
> /**
> @@ -249,14 +264,22 @@ int tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag(struct tty_struct *tty,
> int copied = 0;
> do {
> int goal = min_t(size_t, size - copied, TTY_BUFFER_PAGE);
> - int space = tty_buffer_request_room(tty, goal);
> - struct tty_buffer *tb = tty->buf.tail;
> + int space;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct tty_buffer *tb;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->buf.lock, flags);
> + space = __tty_buffer_request_room(tty, goal);
> + tb = tty->buf.tail;
> /* If there is no space then tb may be NULL */
> - if (unlikely(space == 0))
> + if (unlikely(space == 0)) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->buf.lock, flags);
> break;
> + }
> memcpy(tb->char_buf_ptr + tb->used, chars, space);
> memset(tb->flag_buf_ptr + tb->used, flag, space);
> tb->used += space;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->buf.lock, flags);
> copied += space;
> chars += space;
> /* There is a small chance that we need to split the data over
> @@ -286,14 +309,22 @@ int tty_insert_flip_string_flags(struct tty_struct *tty,
> int copied = 0;
> do {
> int goal = min_t(size_t, size - copied, TTY_BUFFER_PAGE);
> - int space = tty_buffer_request_room(tty, goal);
> - struct tty_buffer *tb = tty->buf.tail;
> + int space;
> + unsigned long __flags;
> + struct tty_buffer *tb;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->buf.lock, __flags);
> + space = __tty_buffer_request_room(tty, goal);
> + tb = tty->buf.tail;
> /* If there is no space then tb may be NULL */
> - if (unlikely(space == 0))
> + if (unlikely(space == 0)) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->buf.lock, __flags);
> break;
> + }
> memcpy(tb->char_buf_ptr + tb->used, chars, space);
> memcpy(tb->flag_buf_ptr + tb->used, flags, space);
> tb->used += space;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->buf.lock, __flags);
> copied += space;
> chars += space;
> flags += space;
> @@ -344,13 +375,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tty_schedule_flip);
> int tty_prepare_flip_string(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned char **chars,
> size_t size)
> {
> - int space = tty_buffer_request_room(tty, size);
> + int space;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct tty_buffer *tb;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->buf.lock, flags);
> + space = __tty_buffer_request_room(tty, size);
> +
> + tb = tty->buf.tail;
> if (likely(space)) {
> - struct tty_buffer *tb = tty->buf.tail;
> *chars = tb->char_buf_ptr + tb->used;
> memset(tb->flag_buf_ptr + tb->used, TTY_NORMAL, space);
> tb->used += space;
> }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->buf.lock, flags);
> return space;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tty_prepare_flip_string);
> @@ -374,13 +412,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tty_prepare_flip_string);
> int tty_prepare_flip_string_flags(struct tty_struct *tty,
> unsigned char **chars, char **flags, size_t size)
> {
> - int space = tty_buffer_request_room(tty, size);
> + int space;
> + unsigned long __flags;
> + struct tty_buffer *tb;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->buf.lock, __flags);
> + space = __tty_buffer_request_room(tty, size);
> +
> + tb = tty->buf.tail;
> if (likely(space)) {
> - struct tty_buffer *tb = tty->buf.tail;
> *chars = tb->char_buf_ptr + tb->used;
> *flags = tb->flag_buf_ptr + tb->used;
> tb->used += space;
> }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->buf.lock, __flags);
> return space;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tty_prepare_flip_string_flags);
> --
> 1.7.4.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-16 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-16 3:00 [PATCH v2] tty: hold lock across tty buffer finding and buffer filling Tu, Xiaobing
2012-03-16 20:14 ` gregkh [this message]
2012-03-16 21:01 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-03-30 10:26 ` Tu, Xiaobing
2012-03-30 10:34 ` Alan Cox
2012-03-30 14:19 ` gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120316201445.GA1240@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=alek.du@intel.com \
--cc=jiao.zuo@intel.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaobing.tu@intel.com \
--cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox