From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755685Ab2CXWdL (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:33:11 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55147 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753990Ab2CXWdJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:33:09 -0400 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 23:33:07 +0100 From: Michal Marek To: Bernhard Walle Cc: Sam Ravnborg , lacombar@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild , zippel@linux-m68k.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/Kbuild.include: Fix portability problem of "echo -e" Message-ID: <20120324223307.GC8947@sepie.suse.cz> References: <1330277718-2667-1-git-send-email-bernhard@bwalle.de> <20120226174805.GA562@merkur.ravnborg.org> <4F4A7126.6020009@bwalle.de> <20120226210551.GA659@merkur.ravnborg.org> <4F677074.90906@bwalle.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F677074.90906@bwalle.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:44:20PM +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote: > Am 26.02.12 22:05, schrieb Sam Ravnborg: > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 06:51:34PM +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote: > >> Am 26.02.12 18:48, schrieb Sam Ravnborg: > >>>>> --- a/scripts/Kbuild.include > >>>>> +++ b/scripts/Kbuild.include > >>>>> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ as-option = $(call try-run,\ > >>>>> # Usage: cflags-y += $(call as-instr,instr,option1,option2) > >>>>> > >>>>> as-instr = $(call try-run,\ > >>>>> - /bin/echo -e "$(1)" | $(CC) $(KBUILD_AFLAGS) -c -xassembler -o "$$TMP" -,$(2),$(3)) > >>>>> + printf "%b\n" "$(1)" | $(CC) $(KBUILD_AFLAGS) -c -xassembler -o "$$TMP" -,$(2),$(3)) > >>>>> > >>>>> # cc-option > >>>>> # Usage: cflags-y += $(call cc-option,-march=winchip-c6,-march=i586) > >>> Roman Zippel removed use of printf in this patch: beda9f3a13bbb22cde92a45f230a02ef2afef6a9 > >>> > >>> I cannot remember why - but it would be good if you could dig up > >>> why - just so we do not hit an old issue again. > >> > >> Well, he used printf "$(1)", that's different from printf "%b\n" "$(1)" > >> since format strings inside $(1) would be interpreted. > > Makes good sense. > > Can we merge that for 3.4? Who is responsible, i.e. whose tree? I merged it to kbuild.git#kbuild now. Michal