From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Yufeng Shen <miletus@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11 v3] drm/i915/intel_i2c: cleanup gmbus/gpio pin assignments
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:20:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120326152011.GT4014@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1332772010-19619-5-git-send-email-djkurtz@chromium.org>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:26:43PM +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> There is no GMBUS "disabled" port 0, nor "reserved" port 7.
> For the other 6 ports there is a fixed 1:1 mapping between pin pairs and
> gmbus ports, which means every real gmbus port has a gpio pin.
>
> Given these realizations, clean up gmbus initialization.
>
> Tested on Sandybridge (gen 6, PCH == CougarPoint) hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c | 63 ++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -370,16 +365,6 @@ static const struct i2c_algorithm gmbus_algorithm = {
> */
> int intel_setup_gmbus(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> - static const char *names[GMBUS_NUM_PORTS] = {
> - "disabled",
> - "ssc",
> - "vga",
> - "panel",
> - "dpc",
> - "dpb",
> - "dpd",
> - "reserved",
> - };
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> int ret, i;
>
> @@ -397,13 +382,14 @@ int intel_setup_gmbus(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> for (i = 0; i < GMBUS_NUM_PORTS; i++) {
> struct intel_gmbus *bus = &dev_priv->gmbus[i];
> + u32 port = i + 1; /* +1 to map gmbus index to pin pair */
On reconsideration you move around gmbus ports here, which will break
things horribly. I've wondered a bit how that could possible work and
noticed that you fix things up in the a later patch when introducing
get_adapter.
This ordering breaks bisecting is a complete no-go. If you want to do this
(I still think the refactor is nice) you need to introduce get_adapter
first, then change the meaning of the array index in this patch while
adjusting the lookup in the new get_adapter function.
Yours, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-26 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-26 14:26 [PATCH 00/11 v3] fix gmbus writes and related issues Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-26 14:26 ` [PATCH 01/11 v3] drm/i915/intel_i2c: cleanup Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-26 15:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-03-26 14:26 ` [PATCH 02/11 v3] drm/i915/intel_i2c: assign HDMI port D to pin pair 6 Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-26 14:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-03-26 15:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-03-26 17:49 ` Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-27 7:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-03-26 14:26 ` [PATCH 03/11 v3] drm/i915/intel_i2c: use i2c pre/post_xfer functions to setup gpio xfers Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-26 14:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-03-26 17:58 ` Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-26 19:06 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-03-26 14:26 ` [PATCH 04/11 v3] drm/i915/intel_i2c: cleanup gmbus/gpio pin assignments Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-26 15:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-03-26 15:20 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2012-03-26 14:26 ` [PATCH 05/11 v3] drm/i915/intel_i2c: allocate gmbus array as part of drm_i915_private Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-26 15:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-03-26 15:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-03-26 14:26 ` [PATCH 06/11 v3] drm/i915/intel_i2c: refactor using intel_gmbus_get_adapter Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-26 15:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-03-26 14:26 ` [PATCH 07/11 v3] drm/i915/intel_i2c: handle zero-length writes Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-26 14:26 ` [PATCH 08/11 v3] drm/i915/intel_i2c: always wait for IDLE before clearing NAK Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-26 14:26 ` [PATCH 09/11 v3] drm/i915/intel_i2c: use WAIT cycle, not STOP Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-26 14:26 ` [PATCH 10/11 v3] drm/i915/intel_i2c: use INDEX cycles for i2c read transactions Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-26 14:26 ` [PATCH 11/11 v3] drm/i915/intel_i2c: reuse GMBUS2 value read in polling loop Daniel Kurtz
2012-03-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 00/11 v3] fix gmbus writes and related issues Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120326152011.GT4014@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=djkurtz@chromium.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miletus@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox