From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754405Ab2C0N4A (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:56:00 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:48259 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753505Ab2C0Nz7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:55:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:55:54 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , LKML Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHSET] perf ui: Small preparation on further UI work Message-ID: <20120327135554.GC5195@infradead.org> References: <1332751896-11210-1-git-send-email-namhyung.kim@lge.com> <20120326173817.GN25820@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:44:42PM +0300, Pekka Enberg escreveu: > I completely missed the newly added tools/perf/ui directory which doesn't > make much sense. We definitely ought to consolidate all this code under > tools/perf/util/ui and gradually move the tui code out of it instead. > > [ I would, however, like to make the directory nesting less deep by > dropping the "util" part from the directory name. But that's a > completely different topic. ] Yeah, the tools/perf/util/ should go away at some point, Borislav's patches are a step in that direction, he is again at it, this time carving out subsets so that we can go on gradually doing this separation, see the tools top level Makefile discussion. - Arnaldo