Re: [rfc] fcntl: Add F_GETOWNER_UIDS option

[Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>]

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:29:23PM +0000, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Cyrill Gorcunov (gorcunov@openvz.org):
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:25:34PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > user_ns_map_uid() should translate uid_t from one namespace to another,
> > > in this case the namespace is the same.
> > > 
> > > user_ns_map_uid(cred->user_ns, cred) must be the identical mapping,
> > > no matter how we change the implementation.
> > > 
> > > What I think you need is
> > > user_ns_map_uid(current_user_ns(), filp->f_owner.cred), the only
> > > problem is that f_owner.cred doesn't exist.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hmm, I was confused by likely() in user_ns_map_uid. But indeed, I think
> > you're so right. Is there some reason why we can't carry f_owner.cred
> > pointer?
> 
> We would need that for this, yes.  However, Eric is working on a new
> patchset which changes the cross-userns uid mappings.  I think it's
> worth simply leaving a comment that this will need to be addressed,
> and leave in the unconverted uid.

Hi Serge, thanks for info. But if it will be unconverted uid, can't
be there some security problem with that which I missed?

	Cyrill