From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756119Ab2C1Ltv (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:49:51 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:36876 "EHLO mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752497Ab2C1Ltu (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:49:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:49:45 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Robert Richter Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, amd: Be more verbose about LVT offset assignments Message-ID: <20120328114944.GB17936@gmail.com> References: <1332876615-29219-1-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1332876615-29219-1-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Robert Richter wrote: > Add information about LVT offset assignments to better debug > firmware bug messages related to this. Which particular bug message(s) is this related to, can you quote an example perhaps? Thanks, Ingo