From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758097Ab2C1Nxm (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:53:42 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:63073 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757928Ab2C1Nxl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:53:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:53:36 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] BFS CPU scheduler version 0.420 AKA "Smoking" for linux kernel 3.3.0 Message-ID: <20120328135336.GA1841@fancy-poultry.org> References: <201203240553.32526.gene.heskett@gmail.com> <57375.1332641134@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20120328051243.GA2138@fancy-poultry.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: private site X-OpenPGP-KeyID: 0x898F89DE X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: 0815 20AD E896 A2B7 488F 4659 4C7B 8951 898F 89DE X-OpenPGP-URL: http://www.fritha.org/htd.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+52 (c26dbc7021f4) (2011-07-01) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:c2j0I6UqJBVBXUvp8h7ZgfvvgpDYu+YIYn5Xp/yqHqW Qa4lfRB/C5wTtezc9+2VVAL4bvo6hyFnvjsrYR4pcYndXtYmC3 JiqsZoAbBeuD7QsMf5JO/aNhQ10Zyx7KkoWywnR9AJwtkPjq23 6bPEqqCzI4Drl4gnLRrW6nvr/O3yFsuxE+/WLdcYIVDz/lVlPx TreP2gDlgdZx8RlJ8/2qSCk9fQv2qpYBbIBRmbIfz2Kg5SC5Ci r692lluoZOwXtC8U8aymHjd5V8zeaob3rjk+fV8lmevcP9TyS4 lj7FLVqwOMffN0y0wPOzlI9TddYVLt9/RlRvfue2qxniLLFVha bb6Rz9mOsumAB4oUL5mYmLv+1bwLd4SojK8WAT8H/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 28.03.2012, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > CFS: ALSA XRUNs in JACK. > BFS: much less ALSA XRUNs in JACK BFS runs on all of my machines, and I know why. But that's not the point here. Why do people not accept and learn from each other? I'm quite shure that both CFS and BFS has good and bad things, why not take the best from both of them and improve it further? Just my 5ø.