From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933161Ab2C1Vdo (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:33:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:64613 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932293Ab2C1Vdo (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:33:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:26:07 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Andrew Morton Cc: Anton Vorontsov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysrq: Use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig() Message-ID: <20120328212606.GA8771@redhat.com> References: <20120324110024.GA14067@lizard> <20120326154303.86126785.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20120328205254.GA6930@redhat.com> <20120328140835.38e1f03f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120328140835.38e1f03f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/28, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:52:54 +0200 > Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > No, this depends on 629d362b9950166c6fac2aa8425db34d824bb043 > > "signal: give SEND_SIG_FORCED more power to beat SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE". > > oop, I meant "this patch looks like 3.4 material"? Ah, yes, in this case I agree. Oleg.