From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kexec-list <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kdump: No need to disable ioapic in crash path
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:02:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120329160227.GP3857@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1330546129-4812-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 03:08:49PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> A customer of ours noticed when their machine crashed, kdump did not
> work but hung instead. Using their firmware dumping solution they
> grabbed a vmcore and decoded the stacks on the cpus. What they
> noticed seemed to be a rare deadlock with the ioapic_lock.
Any feedback?
Cheers,
Don
>
> CPU4:
> machine_crash_shutdown
> -> machine_ops.crash_shutdown
> -> native_machine_crash_shutdown
> -> kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus ------> Send NMI to other CPUs
> -> disable_IO_APIC
> -> clear_IO_APIC
> -> clear_IO_APIC_pin
> -> ioapic_read_entry
> -> spin_lock_irqsave(&ioapic_lock, flags)
> ---Infinite loop here---
>
> CPU0:
> do_IRQ
> -> handle_irq
> -> handle_edge_irq
> -> ack_apic_edge
> -> move_native_irq
> -> mask_IO_APIC_irq
> -> mask_IO_APIC_irq_desc
> -> spin_lock_irqsave(&ioapic_lock, flags)
> ---Receive NMI here after getting spinlock---
> -> nmi
> -> do_nmi
> -> crash_nmi_callback
> ---Infinite loop here---
>
> The problem is that although kdump tries to shutdown minimal hardware,
> it still needs to disable the IO APIC. This requires spinlocks which
> may be held by another cpu. This other cpu is being held infinitely in
> an NMI context by kdump in order to serialize the crashing path. Instant
> deadlock.
>
> Eric, brought up a point that because the boot code was restructured we may
> not need to disable the io apic any more in the crash path. The original
> concern that led to the development of disable_IO_APIC, was that the jiffies
> calibration on boot up relied on the PIT timer for reference. Access
> to the PIT required 8259 interrupts to be working. This wouldn't work
> if the ioapic needed to be configured. So on panic path, the ioapic was
> reconfigured to use virtual wire mode to allow the 8259 to passthrough.
>
> Those concerns don't hold true now, thanks to the jiffies calibration code
> not needing the PIT. As a result, we can remove this call and simplify the
> locking needed in the panic path.
>
> I tested kdump on an Ivy Bridge platform, a Pentium4 and an old athlon that
> did not have an ioapic. All three were successful.
>
> I also tested using lkdtm that would use jprobes to panic the system when
> entering do_IRQ. The idea was to see how the system reacted with an
> interrupt pending in the second kernel. My core2 quad successfully kdump'd
> 3 times in a row with no issues.
>
> v2: removed the disable lapic code too
> v3: re-add disabling of lapic code
>
> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> There are really two problems here. One is the deadlock of the ioapic_lock
> that I describe above. Removing the code to disable the ioapic seems to
> resolve that.
>
> The second issue is handling non-IRQ exceptions like NMIs. Eric asked me
> to include removing the disable lapic code too. However, because the nmi
> watchdog is stil active and kexec zeros out the idt before it jumps to
> purgatory, an NMI that comes in during the transition between the first
> kernel and second kernel will see an empty idt and reset the cpu.
>
> Leaving the code to disable the lapic in, turns off perf and blocks those NMIs
> from happening (though an external NMI would still be an issue but that is no
> different than right now).
>
> I tried playing with a stub idt and leaving it in place through the transition
> to the second kernel, but I can't quite get it to work correctly. Spinning in the
> first kernel before the purgatory jump catches the idt properly. Spinning in
> purgatory before the second kernel jump doesn't. I even disabled the zero'ing
> out of the idt in the purgatory code.
>
> I would like to get resolution on the ioapic deadlock to fix a customer issue
> while working the idt and NMI thing on the side, hence the split of this
> patchset.
>
> Hopefully, people recognize there are two issues here and that this patch
> resolves the first one and the second one needs more debugging and time.
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/crash.c | 3 ---
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
> index 13ad899..b053cf9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
> @@ -96,9 +96,6 @@ void native_machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
> cpu_emergency_svm_disable();
>
> lapic_shutdown();
> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC)
> - disable_IO_APIC();
> -#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_HPET_TIMER
> hpet_disable();
> #endif
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-29 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-29 20:08 [PATCH] x86, kdump: No need to disable ioapic in crash path Don Zickus
2012-03-15 20:26 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-15 21:16 ` Seiji Aguchi
2012-03-15 21:33 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-15 21:37 ` Seiji Aguchi
2012-04-30 20:53 ` Don Zickus
2012-05-02 19:10 ` Seiji Aguchi
2012-05-02 19:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-05-02 19:59 ` Don Zickus
2012-05-02 20:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-29 16:02 ` Don Zickus [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-02 18:12 Don Zickus
2012-02-02 23:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-07 21:57 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-07 22:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-07 23:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-08 20:11 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-08 22:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-09 14:48 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120329160227.GP3857@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).