From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lockups shortly after booting in current git.
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:12:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120329211244.GA18684@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwJkN2BmZJmWfB6FU0TuVKfmh4um8pMKYVUk3aG7JkNwQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 01:59:33PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > I'd suggest restricting the bisect to fs/ first, and if that comes up
> > with something non-sensical, you can always use the good/bad data
> > points for a whole tree bisect.
> >
> > One commit that you might want to try testing is b43d17f31^, and see
> > whether that works. One potential commit that might be suspicious is
> > b43d17f31 given the stack trace shows one process apparently waiting
> > on PageWriteback.
>
> Ahh, that does sound interesting and relevant.
>
> Yeah, maybe the directed approach is worth it. In fact, considering
> the above commie, maybe it might be worth it to be *very* directed,
> and just test that one thing first, and maybe even skip the bisection
> entirely and just test a revert if it looks promising.
I'll try a build with just that reverted, given the bisect build is taking a while.
Any thoughts on any printk's I could add to verify a situation occurred or not ?
The problem with bisecting a bug like this is that it's hard to tell if
the bug has been fixed, or if I've just not hit it yet.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-29 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-29 15:55 lockups shortly after booting in current git Dave Jones
2012-03-29 18:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-29 18:29 ` Dave Jones
[not found] ` <CA+55aFxOcMt_mcr+ZYwc-SpKbROnh4Gn7jqrFY_SZcBy1Ev7Qw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120329182632.GA6891@redhat.com>
2012-03-29 18:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-29 19:53 ` Dave Jones
2012-03-29 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-29 20:26 ` Dave Jones
2012-03-29 20:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-29 20:39 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-29 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-29 21:12 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2012-03-29 21:45 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-29 21:49 ` Dave Jones
2012-03-29 21:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-29 22:54 ` Dave Jones
2012-03-29 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-29 23:35 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-29 23:25 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-29 21:52 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120329211244.GA18684@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox