From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760302Ab2CaPbs (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:31:48 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:59959 "EHLO mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760114Ab2CaPbq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:31:46 -0400 From: Arkadiusz =?utf-8?q?Mi=C5=9Bkiewicz?= To: Vasiliy Kulikov Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: reset mount options after the last procfs umount Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:31:42 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.3.0-06972-ge22057c; KDE/4.8.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Andrew Morton , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan References: <201203220903.15360.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> <201203311619.38921.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> <20120331152039.GA4674@albatros> In-Reply-To: <20120331152039.GA4674@albatros> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <201203311731.42388.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 31 of March 2012, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 16:19 +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > > "after all procs are umounted". For me such way is fine but still can > > suprise people. > > > > Anyway - what's the problem with implementing support for separate > > options for each mount point? > > Well, IMHO multiple procs in one pid namespace is a very strange system > configuration. I didn't see such installations. I have one real world case - linux-vserver.org guests where pid namespace is optional and usually not used. > Why does anybody need it? For me current "3.3 + initial mount options fix" behaviour is fine anyway. > Thanks, -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/