From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753424Ab2DBXyo (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 19:54:44 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:4636 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751763Ab2DBXyn (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 19:54:43 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="136831224" Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:54:12 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg?= Otte Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown Subject: Re: [v3.4-rc1] ACPI regression bisected Message-ID: <20120402235412.GD16303@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device) > ACPI: EC: EC description table is found, configuring boot EC > > Comparing this with the displays of kernel v3.3 the next expected > outputs would be: > > ACPI: Interpreter enabled > ACPI: (supports S0 S5) > > > I bisected the problem to commit: > 6fe0d0628245fdcd6fad8b837c81e8f7ebc3364d "ACPI: Make ACPI interrupt threaded" Hmm, that's odd. It should not really change any semantics. I assume you double checked you hit the right commit? -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only