From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753273Ab2DEPQP (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:16:15 -0400 Received: from linux-sh.org ([111.68.239.195]:56002 "EHLO linux-sh.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752226Ab2DEPQN (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:16:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:15:59 +0900 From: Paul Mundt To: Paul Gortmaker Cc: Stephen Rothwell , dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] sh: fix several build failures from system.h fallout Message-ID: <20120405151558.GD23761@linux-sh.org> References: <1333312727-11428-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <1333312727-11428-8-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20120402010048.GA21647@linux-sh.org> <4F79ECD9.6000108@windriver.com> <20120403095754.a70f38eb70766580843debc7@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:49:30PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > [sorry for empty mail, pilot error] > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > I used to have sh-current and sh trees (and rmobile-current and rmobile) > > trees in linux-next, but they have not been resurrected since the > > kernel.org problems last year ... > > > > They were all branches of > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6.git which is > > still listed in MAINTAINERS but does not exist :-( > > > > Paul M, to you have an alternate place I can fetch from? > > Hi Paul M. > > Is this the tree Stephen should be using in linux-next? > > git://github.com/pmundt/linux-sh.git sh-latest > Yes, that's the current one for sh stuff for now. The rmobile stuff is going through the ARM SoC tree nowadays, so that shouldn't matter. I haven't bothered getting the trees back on kernel.org yet, so I haven't updated the MAINTAINERS entry, but will probably do so in the future.