public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one()
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 19:25:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120407022512.2C65C3E1B12@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120406144917.GE19424@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 15:49:17 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 09:48:32PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> 
> > Can we make devm_gpio_request a static inline wrapper around
> > devm_gpio_request_one() with the flags field set to '0'?  I don't liek
> > the duplication of this function.
> 
> > Similarily, gpio_request() should actually be a static inline around
> > gpio_request_one() instead of the other way around as it is currently
> > written.
> 
> Yeah, I couldn't understand why the non-managed functions were written
> in this way so I followed the same pattern when I added the managed one
> assuming that the original code was sane.

Actually, I looked at it again, and the _one version behaves subtly
different from the non-_one version.  That may be irrelevant though.

g.


-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies,Ltd.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-07  7:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-04 15:14 [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add !CONFIG_GPIOLIB definitions of devm_ functions Mark Brown
2012-04-04 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one() Mark Brown
2012-04-06  4:48   ` Grant Likely
2012-04-06 14:49     ` Mark Brown
2012-04-07  2:25       ` Grant Likely [this message]
2012-04-07  9:00         ` Mark Brown
2012-04-07  9:16           ` Mark Brown
2012-04-06  4:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add !CONFIG_GPIOLIB definitions of devm_ functions Grant Likely
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-02 11:46 Mark Brown
2012-05-02 11:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one() Mark Brown
2012-05-12 19:05   ` Mark Brown
2012-05-18  0:10     ` Grant Likely
2012-05-12 23:19   ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120407022512.2C65C3E1B12@localhost \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox