From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758573Ab2DJIrc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:47:32 -0400
Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:51062 "EHLO
	caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757459Ab2DJIrb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:47:31 -0400
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:47:02 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support
Message-ID: <20120410084702.GM24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1333306720-28344-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120406074942.GO7264@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20120410083130.GK24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120410083543.GC3149@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120410083543.GC3149@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:35:43AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:31:30AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 03:49:45PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > I believe this patch fixes the amba probe failure that impacts any
> > > AMBA platform build with CONFIG_REGULATOR enabled.  Could you consider
> > > to send the fix for -rc soon?
> 
> > No idea.  I don't have Mark's patch in the patch system.
> 
> It's there as far as I can tell - it's 7366/1, which is visible in the
> web interface at:
> 
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=7366/1
> 
> Is there something else I need to do?

Ok, I thought 7366/1 and 7367/1 were part of the same looking at just the
index.

In any case, what would really help is if people would discard patches
they no longer want applying.