From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Cc: serge.hallyn@canonical.com, dhowells@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de,
lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
criu@openvz.org, mtk.manpages@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] test: IPC message queue migration test
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:17:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120410121742.3c0eb61c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120409175419.8358.18639.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>
On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:54:19 +0400
Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com> wrote:
> This test is a part of CRIU development test suit.
>
> ---
> msgque.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Neat. Can you please integrate this into tools/testing/selftests?
You'll need to decide whether it should be under
tools/testing/selftests/checkpoint-restore or
tools/testing/selftests/ipc. Perhaps the former, as you guys will
hopefully have more userspace test harnesses?
Also, I suggest that I throw away the current
c-r-ipc-message-queue-stealing-feature-introduced.patch. Please fold
all the changes you've made to that patch into a single patch and
resend the whole series. I guess that will be two patches:
c-r-ipc-message-queue-stealing-feature-introduced-v2 and the
tools/testing/selftests/ addition.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-10 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-09 17:53 [PATCH 0/4] IPC: message queue checkpoint/restore - requested updates Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-09 17:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] ipc: rename obfuscating MSG_STEAL flag into MSG_PEEK_ALL Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-09 17:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] ipc: move all checkpoint-restore code under appropriate define Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-09 19:47 ` [CRIU] " Pavel Emelyanov
2012-04-10 9:05 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-10 13:27 ` [CRIU] [PATCH v2 " Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-09 17:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] ipc: handle MSG_PEEK_ALL flag if CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE is dropped Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-09 17:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] test: IPC message queue migration test Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-10 19:17 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120410121742.3c0eb61c.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=criu@openvz.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox