public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz>
To: stable@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz
Subject: suspected regression in 3.0.28 - applications having problems binding to ports
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:18:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120413181856.GA2286@nik-comp.lan> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1613 bytes --]

Hi,

I'd like to report following suspicious behaviour of 3.0.27 kernel.

On one of our production boxes, after upgrading from 3.0.26 to 3.0.27,
applications started to behave weird after ~1 day uptime.
Squid started reporting problems binding to port, nagios misbehaved, etc.
I was forced to revert to 3.0.26. We tried to reproduce the problem but were unsuccessful.
After ~1 week without problems with 3.0.26, I tried upgrading this production box to 3.0.27
again to see what happens and the problem appeared again after about one day.

imap started reporting problems:
EMAIL DELIVERY CRITICAL - imap failed: IMAP RECEIVE CRITICAL - Could not connect to A.B.C.D port 993: IO::Socket::INET6 configuration

same for squid:
commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 21 to 0.0.0.0: (98) Address already in use

nagios processes went totally nuts.

There was no other change except for the kernel upgrade.
The box is x86_64 quad CPU 4GB machine, what might be important, we're using
IPv6 as well.
I don't see any suspicious (at least to me) patch between 3.0.26 and 3.0.27.
Since it seems to take quite a long to reproduce, I haven't tried bisect yet, first
wanted to ask - hasn't anyone experienced similar problems?

thanks a lot in advance!

with best regards

nik


-- 
-------------------------------------
Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava

tel.:   +420 596 603 142
fax:    +420 596 621 273
mobil:  +420 777 093 799

www.linuxbox.cz

mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: servis@linuxbox.cz
-------------------------------------

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2012-04-13 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-13 18:18 Nikola Ciprich [this message]
2012-04-13 18:54 ` suspected regression in 3.0.28 - applications having problems binding to ports Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-04-13 19:08   ` Nikola Ciprich
2012-04-23  5:23     ` Nikola Ciprich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120413181856.GA2286@nik-comp.lan \
    --to=nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox