public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] blkcg: make request_queue bypassing on allocation
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:37:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120413203758.GJ26383@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120413203205.GI26383@redhat.com>

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:32:05PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:11:31PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With the previous change to guarantee bypass visiblity for RCU read
> > lock regions, entering bypass mode involves non-trivial overhead and
> > future changes are scheduled to make use of bypass mode during init
> > path.  Combined it may end up adding noticeable delay during boot.
> > 
> > This patch makes request_queue start its life in bypass mode, which is
> > ended on queue init completion at the end of
> > blk_init_allocated_queue(), and updates blk_queue_bypass_start() such
> > that draining and RCU synchronization are performed only when the
> > queue actually enters bypass mode.
> > 
> > This avoids unnecessarily switching in and out of bypass mode during
> > init avoiding the overhead and any nasty surprises which may step from
> > leaving bypass mode on half-initialized queues.
> 
> Tejun, I am not sure that this will fix the problem completely. I think
> we will still face the overhead of synchronize_rcu() in
> blkcg_deactivate_policy() as it will be called from cfq_exit_queue() for
> initialized queues.
> 
> In the past I had I had used synchronize_rcu() in cfq_exit_queue() and
> noticed the overhead. Looks like driver was creating fully initialized
> queues and tearing these apart soon.

Here is the old commit. Driver in question was megaraid.

commit bb729bc98c0f3e6a898d8730df3e2830bf68751a
Author: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Date:   Sun Dec 6 09:54:19 2009 +0100

    cfq-iosched: use call_rcu() instead of doing grace period stall on queue exit

    After the merge of the IO controller patches, booting on my megaraid box
    ran much slower. Vivek Goyal traced it down to megaraid discovery creating
    tons of devices, each suffering a grace period when they later kill that
    queue (if no device is found).
    
    So lets use call_rcu() to batch these deferred frees, instead of taking
    the grace period hit for each one.

Thanks
Vivek

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-13 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-13 20:11 [PATCHSET] block: per-queue policy activation, take#2 Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 01/11] cfq: fix build breakage & warnings Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 02/11] blkcg: kill blkio_list and replace blkio_list_lock with a mutex Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 03/11] blkcg: use @pol instead of @plid in update_root_blkg_pd() and blkcg_print_blkgs() Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 04/11] blkcg: remove static policy ID enums Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] blkcg: make blkg_conf_prep() take @pol and return with queue lock held Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 06/11] blkcg: make sure blkg_lookup() returns %NULL if @q is bypassing Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:50   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 07/11] blkcg: make request_queue bypassing on allocation Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:32   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:37     ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:44       ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:47         ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:55           ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 21:05             ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:16               ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:31                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-17 12:04                 ` James Bottomley
2012-04-18 21:42                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:33               ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 21:38                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-16 12:39                   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:37     ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] blkcg: add request_queue->root_blkg Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 09/11] blkcg: implement per-queue policy activation Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] blkcg: drop stuff unused after per-queue policy activation update Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] blkcg: shoot down blkgs if all policies are deactivated Tejun Heo
2012-04-20  8:09 ` [PATCHSET] block: per-queue policy activation, take#2 Jens Axboe
2012-04-20 12:02   ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-20 17:17     ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-20 19:08       ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-25 18:19         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120413203758.GJ26383@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ctalbott@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rni@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox