From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755681Ab2DNQwv (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:52:51 -0400 Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.159]:59195 "EHLO e38.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751581Ab2DNQwu (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:52:50 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:52:42 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, patches@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] rcu: v2 Inlinable preemptible rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() Message-ID: <20120414165242.GG2452@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20120414161953.GA18140@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12041416-5518-0000-0000-000003AA7869 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 09:38:50AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Paul E. McKenney > wrote: > > > > This series is version two of the inlinable versions of preemptible > > RCU's __rcu_read_lock() and __rcu_read_unlock(). > > Btw, what is this supposed to apply on top of? It doesn't seem to > apply cleanly to either v3.3, v3.4-rc[12], or current top-of-tree. > > I can make it apply by reducing the context to just one line for > patch#6, but your base seems to be odd. My next step is to forward-port to 4.4-rc2, retest, and expose to -next. The base is on top of the series that was pulled into the 4.4 merge window, but on their base on top of 3.4-rc4. I probably should have forward-ported before submitting, but I was so happy about it finally actually passing a moderate version of the full set of rcutorture tests that I just couldn't restrain myself. Thanx, Paul