From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751305Ab2DPGxB (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 02:53:01 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:64015 "EHLO mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750869Ab2DPGxA (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 02:53:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:52:49 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andreas Herrmann Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, amd: Re-enable CPU topology extensions in case BIOS has disabled it Message-ID: <20120416065249.GA5292@gmail.com> References: <20120411152640.GC4794@alberich.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120411152640.GC4794@alberich.amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andreas Herrmann wrote: > > For detection of thread siblings we are relying on the topology > extension CPUID leafs. Thus we have to re-enable it in case BIOS tries > to hide the correpsonding CPUID feature flag. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann This changelog is missing some key information: - how did you find the bug - did you see some actual badness? - what practical effect (if any) did you see from this patch? - what practical effect (if any) do you expect others to see from this patch? This kind of information helps us prioritize bugfixes and helps us determine whether a fix requires a -stable backport. Thanks, Ingo