From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753064Ab2DPJWq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:22:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:40229 "EHLO mail-wi0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752653Ab2DPJWo (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:22:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:22:38 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Chen, Dennis (SRDC SW)" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "peterz@infradead.org" , Paul Mackerras , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tools perf: Add a new benchmark tool for semaphore/mutex Message-ID: <20120416092238.GA27526@gmail.com> References: <491D6B4EAD0A714894D8AD22F4BDE043B158D5@SCYBEXDAG03.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <491D6B4EAD0A714894D8AD22F4BDE043B158D5@SCYBEXDAG03.amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Chen, Dennis (SRDC SW) wrote: > A new performance benchmark tool for semaphore or mutex lock. it would be very useful to paste the output of the tool into the changelog, to explain why we want it, to explain how it should be used - in addition to explaining (on a high level) how it's implemented, what its assumptions are, etc. etc. A oneliner changelog is really not adequate. Thanks, Ingo