From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754789Ab2DPRdo (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:33:44 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:8898 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750990Ab2DPRdn (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:33:43 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="130245599" Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:42:35 +0200 From: Samuel Ortiz To: Linus Walleij Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Srinidhi Kasagar , Rabin Vincent , Jonas Aberg , Per Forlin , Ulf Hansson Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd/db5500-prcmu: delete DB5500 PRCMU support Message-ID: <20120416174235.GS24130@sortiz-mobl> References: <1334564854-6102-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 01:18:15PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Linus Walleij > wrote: > > > From: Linus Walleij > > > > This platform has been obsoleted and was only available inside of > > ST-Ericsson, no users of this code are left in the world. This > > deletes the core U5500 support entirely in the same manner as the > > obsoleted U8500 silicon was previously deleted. > > > > Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar > > Cc: Rabin Vincent > > Cc: Jonas Aberg > > Cc: Per Forlin > > Cc: Ulf Hansson > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > > BTW Sam, these have cross-dependencies on stuff happening in arch/arm/mach-ux500 > so if I can get ACKs for this it's better if I merge it through the > AMR SoC tree. Argh, and I thought I would get to apply the jumbo code deleting patches ;) Please add my Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz to both of them. > HOWEVER: if you apply Axel Lin's patch reording all the KConfig entries, that > will *not* work, we might have to merge this during the merge window in that > case, so I want to know how to proceed here ... if the Kconfig patch is applied > to the -rc:s or postponed, I can merge these two patches. I can postpone Axel's patch, and have it merged as a 2nd pull request during the next merge window. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/