From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, microcode: Ensure that module is only loaded for
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:50:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120417145002.GA11221@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F8D7A0A.4080404@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:41:22PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 04/16/2012 07:13 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 02:12:00PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> >> I guess a similar change in intel microcode driver would also be
> >> worthwhile, right? If so, then the below patch might be useful:
> >
> > AFAICT, you'd need to test this on a box which is not supported (family
> > check below). Or you can tweak the family check so that it doesn't
> > apply and run it on a test box of yours to see whether the module still
> > unloads properly in the error case (and doesn't remain loaded as in
> > our case due to something in sysfs remaining registered although it
> > shouldn't).
> >
> Judging by the nature of the code itself, its evident that this problem
> is not restricted to AMD alone. In any case, I went ahead and did the
> (tweaked) test that you suggested and here is the result:
>
> 1. dmesg logs :
> [ 21.912451] microcode: CPU0 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 21.916028] microcode: CPU1 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 21.934624] microcode: CPU2 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 21.940276] microcode: CPU3 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 21.946023] microcode: CPU4 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 21.951678] microcode: CPU5 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 21.957326] microcode: CPU6 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 21.962935] microcode: CPU7 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 21.968611] microcode: CPU8 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 21.974212] microcode: CPU9 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 21.979842] microcode: CPU10 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 21.985577] microcode: CPU11 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 21.991323] microcode: CPU12 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 21.997055] microcode: CPU13 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 22.002774] microcode: CPU14 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 22.008460] microcode: CPU15 not a capable Intel processor
> [ 22.014600] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba
>
> 2. lsmod | grep microcode
> microcode 117749 0
>
> 3. rmmod microcode
>
> 4. dmesg logs:
> [ 64.297638] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 64.302332] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/group.c:142 sysfs_remove_group+0xd9/0xe0()
> [ 64.309446] Hardware name: IBM System x -[7870C4Q]-
> [ 64.309449] sysfs group ffffffffa03a5110 not found for kobject 'cpu0'
> [ 64.309451] Modules linked in: ipv6 cpufreq_conservative cpufreq_userspace cpufreq_powersave acpi_cpufreq mperf fuse loop dm_mod coretemp crc32c_intel shpchp microcode(-) cdc_ether usbnet ioatdma bnx2 mii serio_raw pcspkr pci_hotplug i2c_i801 i7core_edac i2c_core dca edac_core iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support tpm_tis tpm sg tpm_bios rtc_cmos button uhci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore usb_common sd_mod crc_t10dif edd ext3 mbcache jbd fan processor mptsas mptscsih mptbase scsi_transport_sas scsi_mod thermal thermal_sys hwmon
> [ 64.309499] Pid: 6529, comm: rmmod Not tainted 3.4.0-rc3-intelucodebroken-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #2
> [ 64.309501] Call Trace:
> [ 64.309506] [<ffffffff811fac69>] ? sysfs_remove_group+0xd9/0xe0
> [ 64.309510] [<ffffffff811fac69>] ? sysfs_remove_group+0xd9/0xe0
> [ 64.309516] [<ffffffff8103dd2a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0
> [ 64.309522] [<ffffffff8103de01>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x41/0x50
> [ 64.309526] [<ffffffff811f87b6>] ? sysfs_get_dirent+0x56/0x80
> [ 64.309531] [<ffffffff811fac69>] sysfs_remove_group+0xd9/0xe0
> [ 64.309538] [<ffffffffa03a2118>] mc_device_remove+0x78/0xa0 [microcode]
> [ 64.309545] [<ffffffff8134b219>] subsys_interface_unregister+0x89/0xd0
> [ 64.309553] [<ffffffffa03a357a>] microcode_exit+0x5a/0xa4 [microcode]
> [ 64.309559] [<ffffffff810b0c8a>] sys_delete_module+0x16a/0x2b0
> [ 64.309565] [<ffffffff810a408d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x12d/0x1b0
> [ 64.309573] [<ffffffff814b36f9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 64.309576] ---[ end trace 748ddf8b4218f820 ]---
>
>
> The above warning was repeated for each cpu, of course.
Right, this is the warning we're seeing too. Applying your patch fixes
it, I s'pose? If so, maybe x86 people would pick it up.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-11 16:38 x86, microcode: Conversion from sysdev class caused regression Andreas Herrmann
2012-04-11 17:06 ` Kay Sievers
2012-04-11 20:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-11 20:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-04-11 20:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-12 16:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-12 16:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, microcode: Fix sysfs warning during module unload Borislav Petkov
2012-04-12 22:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-04-12 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, microcode: Ensure that module is only loaded for Borislav Petkov
2012-04-12 22:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-04-16 8:42 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-04-16 13:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-17 14:11 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-04-17 14:50 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-04-17 15:53 ` Gene Heskett
2012-04-17 16:02 ` Kay Sievers
2012-04-17 17:30 ` Gene Heskett
2012-04-17 18:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-22 2:55 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-04-25 23:36 ` Kay Sievers
2012-04-17 17:35 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-05-08 4:28 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/microcode: Ensure that module is only loaded on supported Intel CPUs tip-bot for Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-04-14 18:23 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, microcode: Fix sysfs warning during module unload on unsupported CPUs tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
2012-04-14 18:24 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, microcode: Ensure that module is only loaded on supported AMD CPUs tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120417145002.GA11221@aftab \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).