From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pidns: reboot_pid_ns: use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig()
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:35:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120417183513.GA1037@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120416212606.GA27490@redhat.com>
On 04/16, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> I'll investigate and report tomorrow.
Thanks again Serge, everything is clear. Afaics this needs another
(almost off-topic) patch.
Please forget about sys_reboot() for the moment. There is a minor
and known problem with SIGKILL && SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE. If you send
SIGKILL from the parent namespace to cinit, this doesn't make it
SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT immediately. Only after cinit actually dequeues
SIGKILL it does do_group_exit() and set this flag. This should be
fixed anyway, but not now.
And this explain the problem. Note that your test-case does
sys_reboot() from the init process, and reboot_pid_ns() does
kill(pid_ns->child_reaper, SIGKILL);
do_exit(0);
so it sends SIGKILL to itself and exit. This means that cinit
(current) obviously can't dequeue SIGKILL, and without
SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT wait_task_zombie() ignores
signal->group_exit_code.
That is why the patch makes a difference.
But why reboot_pid_ns() does do_exit? Yes, it was copied from
sys_reboot() and I didn't notice. It should use do_group_exit(),
and sys_reboot() too. This is the patch I am going to send, but
I'll try to think a bit more.
Thanks!
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 0:44 [PATCH] pidns: reboot_pid_ns: use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig() Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-13 18:20 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-04-13 19:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-13 19:34 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-04-16 13:59 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-04-16 15:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 16:24 ` Serge Hallyn
2012-04-16 21:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 18:35 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-04-18 2:29 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120417183513.GA1037@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox