From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: RFC [patch] sched,cgroup_sched: convince RT_GROUP_SCHED throttle to work
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:20:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120418052057.GA19328@zhy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334465495.7802.6.camel@marge.simpson.net>
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 06:51:35AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Like so seems to work. I personally like 2 lines better, but whatever
> solves dinky but deadly problem works for me.
>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 7 ++++++-
> kernel/sched/rt.c | 9 +++++++++
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -5875,6 +5875,11 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *s
> sd->child = NULL;
> }
>
> + if (sd)
> + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_isolated_map);
> + else
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_isolated_map);
> +
Do we allow this?
Seems sched_domain_debug() will bite !sd.
Thanks,
Yong
> sched_domain_debug(sd, cpu);
>
> rq_attach_root(rq, rd);
> @@ -5886,7 +5891,7 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *s
> }
>
> /* cpus with isolated domains */
> -static cpumask_var_t cpu_isolated_map;
> +cpumask_var_t cpu_isolated_map;
>
> /* Setup the mask of cpus configured for isolated domains */
> static int __init isolated_cpu_setup(char *str)
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -922,6 +922,9 @@ static void update_curr_rt(struct rq *rq
> if (!rt_bandwidth_enabled())
> return;
>
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu_of(rq), cpu_isolated_map))
> + return;
> +
> for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
> rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
>
> @@ -1014,6 +1017,9 @@ static inline void dec_rt_prio(struct rt
> static void
> inc_rt_group(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
> {
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq)->cpu, cpu_isolated_map))
> + return;
> +
> if (rt_se_boosted(rt_se))
> rt_rq->rt_nr_boosted++;
>
> @@ -1035,6 +1041,9 @@ dec_rt_group(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_
> static void
> inc_rt_group(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
> {
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq)->cpu, cpu_isolated_map))
> + return;
> +
> start_rt_bandwidth(&def_rt_bandwidth);
> }
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ struct rt_bandwidth {
>
> extern struct mutex sched_domains_mutex;
>
> +/* cpus with isolated domains */
> +extern cpumask_var_t cpu_isolated_map;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
>
> #include <linux/cgroup.h>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Only stand for myself
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-18 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-03 9:08 [patch] sched,rt: non-isolated cores lift isolcpus throttle for CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED Mike Galbraith
2012-04-03 9:19 ` [patch] sched,rt: let the user see rt queues in /proc/sched_debug Mike Galbraith
2012-04-07 8:58 ` [patch] sched,cgroup_sched: fix up task_groups list buglet Mike Galbraith
2012-04-07 9:54 ` RFC [patch] sched,cgroup_sched: convince RT_GROUP_SCHED throttle to work Mike Galbraith
2012-04-10 9:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-14 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-15 3:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-15 3:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-15 4:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-18 5:20 ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2012-04-18 6:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-18 7:48 ` Yong Zhang
2012-04-18 8:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-19 6:34 ` Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120418052057.GA19328@zhy \
--to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox