From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752500Ab2DRKdi (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:33:38 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:49658 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751362Ab2DRKdh (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:33:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:33:34 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Li Yang-R58472 Cc: Zhao Chenhui-B35336 , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: avoid I2C abnormal after resuming from deep sleep Message-ID: <20120418103334.GD2232@pengutronix.de> References: <1330511961-22498-1-git-send-email-chenhui.zhao@freescale.com> <20120229183436.GA30545@pengutronix.de> <20120417142105.GA21802@pengutronix.de> <94F013E7935FF44C83EBE7784D62AD3F092D1DC7@039-SN2MPN1-022.039d.mgd.msft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UfEAyuTBtIjiZzX6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <94F013E7935FF44C83EBE7784D62AD3F092D1DC7@039-SN2MPN1-022.039d.mgd.msft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:21e:67ff:fe11:9c5c X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wsa@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --UfEAyuTBtIjiZzX6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, > We certainly don't want the policy to be against the common practice > of the community. If it is we can consider changing our policy. Nice, thanks for being open to discussion! > However I can't find a clear message stating the consensus of what the > Linux kernel community think of adding copyright claims. I even found Well, what I know, the consensus is "common sense". What is obviously not "clear" in a way you could write it down. At least, Ben agrees. > some message that encourage adding copyright to maintain the GPL > license. I am interested. Do you have a link? Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --UfEAyuTBtIjiZzX6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+OmH4ACgkQD27XaX1/VRubswCfWX0Qu6/PjR7yzGUDfHwBiw05 DAgAoLlVGb8xLugS8oGhajd5dFYBn2jO =eGmZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UfEAyuTBtIjiZzX6--