From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"matthltc@us.ibm.com" <matthltc@us.ibm.com>,
"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@parallels.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file-update-after-mm- num_exe_file_vmas-removal.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 02:32:52 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120419223252.GV1893@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120419220918.GA5474@redhat.com>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:09:19AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > I guess maybe it's time to drop one-shot requirement and as result
> > we can drop MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED bit completely,
>
> Plus perhaps we can remove this for_each_vma check?
>
> > making overall code simplier?
>
> Personally I'd certainly prefer this ;)
>
> But let me repeat to avoid the confusion. I am fine either way,
> I am not going to discuss this again unless I see something which
> looks technically wrong. And the current MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED
> doesn't look right even if the problem is minor.
So if there no stong agrues against, lets rip all together --
and for_each_vma and MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED bits, finally making
code simplier.
Cyrill
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-19 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120419185221.E8ED6A055E@akpm.mtv.corp.google.com>
2012-04-19 19:20 ` + c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file-update-after-mm- num_exe_file_vmas-removal.patch added to -mm tree Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 21:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-04-19 21:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 21:32 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-04-19 22:08 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-04-19 22:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-04-19 22:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 21:46 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-04-19 21:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 22:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-04-19 22:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-19 22:28 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-04-19 22:32 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120419223252.GV1893@moon \
--to=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox