From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, "David Ahern" <dsahern@gmail.com>,
"Robert Richter" <robert.richter@amd.com>,
"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf stat: useless output for raw events with new event parser
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:57:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120423105726.GD1720@m.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBQJU2vYLbr-=qjkpG=sB8n-8aXJ3QkWcASzy5h4rtFAig@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:45:34PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the new event parser, one can express raw events field by field:
>
> $ perf stat -e cpu/event=0x3c,umask=0x0/,cpu/event=0xc5,umask=0x0/ noploop 1
>
> The problem with this is that the output of perf stat becomes useless:
>
> $ perf stat -e cpu/event=0x3c,umask=0x0/,cpu/event=0xc5,umask=0x0/ noploop 1
> noploop for 1 seconds
>
> Performance counter stats for 'noploop 1':
>
> 2395038678 pmu
> 10787 pmu
> ^^^^^^
> 1.000802603 seconds time elapsed
>
> We lose the event names or encoding completely. Now for all events
> expressed via this
> new syntax , all we see is 'pmu'. That is pretty useless. It is hard
> to decrypt the results
> without some serious scripting.
>
> Not sure how to solve this given how the parser works. This looks like
> a regression to me.
I dont think thats regression, since you use new way to express an event.
Please check my answer in the other reply to Peter.
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-23 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-23 10:45 [BUG] perf stat: useless output for raw events with new event parser Stephane Eranian
2012-04-23 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 10:55 ` Jiri Olsa
2012-04-23 10:56 ` Robert Richter
2012-04-23 11:17 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-04-26 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-26 12:53 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-04-26 14:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-26 13:12 ` Robert Richter
2012-04-26 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-26 14:45 ` Robert Richter
2012-04-26 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-26 17:36 ` Robert Richter
2012-05-07 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-07 16:58 ` Robert Richter
2012-04-23 10:57 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2012-05-02 11:14 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120423105726.GD1720@m.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox