From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756914Ab2DYQ51 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:57:27 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:45511 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756161Ab2DYQ5Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:57:25 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:57:31 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Luck, Tony" , Ingo Molnar Cc: Borislav Petkov , EDAC devel , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] AMD thresholding fixes Message-ID: <20120425165730.GB18314@x1.osrc.amd.com> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , "Luck, Tony" , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , EDAC devel , LKML References: <1335369123-23196-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F170F3C53@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F170F3C53@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 04:49:52PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > > If there are no issues, I'll add the queue to linux-next (I don't see a > > branch from ras.git in linux-next, btw, which is strange). > > Patches so far have been flowing from "ras" to "tip" to "linus". It > hasn't quite been clear how linux-next fits into this. If we export > to -next, then are we planning on sending those directly to linus, > bypassing tip? That's actually a good point. Once in -tip, they're seeing linux-next anyway. Ok, Ingo, what would you guys rather have: * ras tree -> linux-next -> we send pull request to Linus or * ras tree -> -tip -> linux-next (automatically due to tip daily merges) -> you send pull request to Linus I guess I'm fine with both, second one makes us even lazier :) Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.