From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Lockdep false positive in sysfs
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:59:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120425215936.GC8989@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1204251436140.1206-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Hello, Alan.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 02:58:28PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> Peter and Tejun:
>
> Here's my problem, which affects several sysfs attribute methods in the
> USB subsystem:
>
> Sysfs attribute A is attached to a USB device D. When the user writes
> to A, the corresponding store method unregisters D's children (it does
> not unregister D, though).
>
> Now, some of these children may also be USB devices (i.e., if D is a
> hub), and therefore may have the same set of sysfs attributes. As a
> result, A's store method for D will end up removing the A attribute for
> device E, where E is a child of D.
>
> This causes lockdep to complain. When A's method is called, sysfs
> tells lockdep that it holds a readlock for the s_active "rwsem"
> associated with the A attribute for D. However the sysfs routine that
> removes attributes tells lockdep that it is going to get a writelock
> for the s_active associated with the A attribute for E, which is in the
> same lockdep class since it belongs to the same attribute.
Hmmm.... This happens because, by default, sysfs_dirents for the same
attr share the same lockdep key. This happens from
sysfs_dirent_init_lockdep(). Hmm.... we can,
* Somehow assign different keys to sysfs_dirents for the specific
attr. Use array of attrs indexed by bus depth?
* Add a flag / whatever to attr indicating that the files of the
attribute may be removed recursively (lockdep-wise) and update
either read or write path to use subclass.
Any better ideas?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-25 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-25 18:58 Lockdep false positive in sysfs Alan Stern
2012-04-25 21:59 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-04-26 8:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-04-26 18:14 ` Alan Stern
2012-04-26 22:17 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 15:57 ` Alan Stern
2012-04-27 16:09 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-03 21:30 ` Alan Stern
2012-05-04 16:52 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-04 19:08 ` Alan Stern
2012-05-07 19:46 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-07 21:51 ` Alan Stern
2012-05-07 21:55 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-08 18:53 ` Alan Stern
2012-05-09 17:41 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-09 17:47 ` Alan Stern
2012-05-09 17:48 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 16:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-04-27 18:27 ` Alan Stern
2012-04-27 20:17 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 21:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-04-27 21:16 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-29 2:00 ` Alan Stern
2012-04-29 2:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120425215936.GC8989@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox