From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1761413Ab2D0Ulg (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:41:36 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f51.google.com ([209.85.210.51]:63361 "EHLO
	mail-pz0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1761395Ab2D0Uld (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:41:33 -0400
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:41:27 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        "cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>, Han Ying <yinghan@google.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, kamezawa.hiroyuki@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 8/9 v2] cgroup: avoid creating new cgroup under a
 cgroup being destroyed
Message-ID: <20120427204127.GO26595@google.com>
References: <4F9A327A.6050409@jp.fujitsu.com>
 <4F9A36DE.30301@jp.fujitsu.com>
 <20120427204035.GN26595@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120427204035.GN26595@google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:40:35PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> stands.  The only change necessary is memcg's pre_destroy() not
> returning zero.

Umm.. that should have been "always returning zero". :)

-- 
tejun