From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754985Ab2D0ViX (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:38:23 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:64351 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754242Ab2D0ViW (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:38:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:38:17 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Li Zefan , LKML , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Glauber Costa , "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] res_counter: Account max_usage when calling res_counter_charge_nofail() Message-ID: <20120427213817.GT26595@google.com> References: <1335309096-12886-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1335309096-12886-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1335309096-12886-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:11:36AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Updating max_usage is something one would expect when we reach > a new maximum usage value even when we do this by forcing through > the limit with res_counter_charge_nofail(). > > (Whether we want to account failcnt when we force through the limit > is another debate). > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker > Cc: Tejun Heo > Cc: Li Zefan > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > Cc: Glauber Costa > Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov Applied to cgroup/for-3.5. Thanks. -- tejun