From: Chris Jones <chrisjones@spin.net.au>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: 3.1+ kernels unbootable
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:21:06 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120429122106.044a1c88@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120425144452.32a803fe@notabene.brown>
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:44:52 +1000
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>
> You have a couple of options here.
>
> One is to use git-bisect to narrow down where the breakage is. This
> means building about a dozen or a score of kernels and testing each
> one and then trying again. If you are happy building your own
> kernels and have an afternoon to spare this is probably a good idea.
> There should be plenty of instruction on the web about how to do this
> but if you cannot find any feel free to ask.
>
> The other is to try turning features off and debugging on.
> Many distros have some sort of "fail-safe" boot option which disables
> things like ACPI and known-problematic drivers... though with it
> failing so early most drives won't have even tried to run. I'd guess
> an ACPI problem, but that is largely because I know almost nothing
> about ACPI so it is easy to blame it. So try adding "acpi=off" to
> the boot args.
>
> Linux has a thing called 'early_printk' which allows messages to be
> displayed even before the normal drivers are loaded. I don't know
> much about enabling that on an x86 system (I use it a lot on ARM
> though). You need it enabled when the kernel is compiled, and you
> need a boot arg to enable it too. Maybe if you manage to enable
> that you might get some message printed.
>
> Or maybe there is some other much more useful thing you can try and
> someone else will chime in soon and tell me I don't know what I'm
> talking about and explain in detail the right way so solve this
> problem - that would be awesome.
>
> NeilBrown
I have tried all ACPI disabled options and also all safe-mode options,
among many other modes. Nothing has worked.
Now that Ubuntu 12.04 has gone gold, I might try the latest kernel in
that and see if anything has changed.
Thanks Neil.
Regards
Chris Jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-29 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-25 2:49 3.1+ kernels unbootable Chris Jones
2012-04-25 3:21 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-25 4:20 ` Chris Jones
2012-04-25 4:44 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-25 15:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-29 2:21 ` Chris Jones [this message]
2012-05-21 21:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120429122106.044a1c88@ubuntu \
--to=chrisjones@spin.net.au \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox